great so I now need at least 4 apps to pay at least twice as much to get where I want half as fast.
Progress!!!
great so I now need at least 4 apps to pay at least twice as much to get where I want half as fast.
Progress!!!
Soldato
Welcome to Google's business model.
Soldato
It's scary with cloud computing companies are building crazy positions Microsoft hosted email solution dominates the business world and I can see them cranking the price and making leaving a right pain in a few years time!
But both google and Microsoft do at least turn a profit Uber's use of venture capital to put local firms out of business is shocking!
which would anger the anti trust boards who would force Microsoft to split it as they have in the last
I had a laugh at the bypassing of mentioning how overloaded londons roads are.
Private hire transport is hilariously inefficient and encourages congestion.
Taxi!
90% of people that actually use uber are entirely happy with it. Was always going to happen. It's the people that don't use uber that want to force their views on them driven by the paranoia created by the LTDA.
The anti uber lobby that has been pressing TfL for years would not care if uber was not a success. The LTDA have tried the legality approach and now its a smear appproach. To be fair no group has ever voluntarily given up a monopoly.
It would have if the petition was the government petition website. I'm not sure where the petition was created.
The Mayor of London has felt the need to respond directly. It is clear that a lot of Londoners do not view the action as proportionate.
Yes only for them to say the ban still stands, or that it's a matter for London and not central government.
A petition doesn't put them above the law.
But they can debate whether TfL is wrong. TfL aren't the law.
Soldato
Actually TfL are the law in this area it is upto them who does and who doesn't get a license!
Of course loads of Londoners are annoyed they enjoy the cheaper prices and convenience uber is a great idea but the company are scummy and something needs to be done about the anti competitive undercutting of every other taxi service using hedge fund backing to negate the massive losses. That's before you get into the working practices they follow!
Its only amongst the socialist monopoly that is the London cab trade can someone suggest undercutting is a bad thing. Many companies lose money initially. They also aren't actually making massive losses in the UK.
Their working practises are no worse than most of the PCO companies that exist in London. I would argue actually a lot better.
What do you think the working practices at your local minicab office are like?
Their working practises are no worse than most of the PCO companies that exist in London. I would argue actually a lot better.
What do you think the working practices at your local minicab office are like?