Why on earth is anyone mentioning age at Chelsea, when the two oldest players on the pitch by a MASSIVE margin were Utd players.
People talk utter, utter trash about age, and its hilarious.
Age was not even close to a factor in Chelsea's performance, it was a bad performance, the young players were bad, the older players were bad, the oldest players both played well and played for Utd.
Lampard has come back pretty much off his first ever long term injury, afaik he's never had a "serious" injury in well his entire time at Chelsea, and Chelsea got crap while he was out and are still a bit crap.
Drogba, anyone, I mean anyone suggesting they should ditch a striker, in a bad season, who has 11 goals, 10 assists, is just flat out stupid. He bullied Utd when he came on, he made Evra look stupid, he made Rio look stupid, he made Vidic look stupid with simple turns.
He has freaking Malaria(or had it) midway through a season and didn't stop playing but it clearly took something out of him, and he's outperformed the guy who is still the top Liverpool scorer for the season since his move.
Cech is young, Lampard needs a bit more match fitness and less rubbish players around him. Shockingly Lampard looks less good with Ramires and a woefully out of form Essien, than a solid Ballack, an inform Essien and everyone else in form aswell.
Cole, Lampard, Anelka, Drogba, the only one of those showing ANY slowing down is also the one who had a half year injury.
The crap players are still the crap players, and need replacing, one good season out of 4 doesn't make Malouda good, especially when you factor in how he scored his goals last year(not many games, all massive victories by Chelsea, all large victories without his goals, only 2 or 3 of his goals having any effect on the result, ie, still useless).
They need a stronger manager, bringing in a woefully out of form Torres, when Sturridge looked very good and was getting zero chances, not spending on a winger.