This is such a nothing thing to be arguing about![]()
Really Tom? Wiki?![]()
Henderson was £16m but Enrique was closer to £5.5m.
And if I remember correctly, Nacional announced the figures for the Coates deal (it was in $'s) and worked out at just under £5m.
spurs lost to young boys as
1. we were poor
2. it was out first cl game. nerves got the better of us
3. it was an astro turf pitch
we lost by 1 goal and then stuck 4 past them at the lane. we also went on to do very well in the competition.
Hendersen was 13 million + 3 mill in addons (don't think those addon clauses will come into effect either) And your right Coates was a Dollar figure by all accounts.
pretty silly to call it a poor performance when there were 4 "senior" players starting, of which only 1 (Enrique) could be called a 1st teamer and as you've rightly pointed out other teams have played YB's and lost recently with far stronger teams out![]()
Enrique cost £5.5 Mill
Coates cost £6.8 Mill
Henderson cost £13 Mill
Borini cost £10.5 Mill
Apart from that good effort.
yet Rodgers was talking as if it was a development squad.
we've got a mix of players here - we've got players who have won this tournament, we've got experienced international players and some very talented players
Really? This is what Rodgers actually said about the squad that travelled prior to the match:
Nice judgement based on a few games, your knee okay?
I don't often listen to Talksport so I can't comment on that but from everthing I've read, seen or listened to, the only comment from him that's remotely close to what you're suggesting was that we had a very young side - which we did.
but I've also read it contained "young and fringe players".
The likes of Henderson, Borini, Shelvey, Coates should not be deemed that.