There is also that little thing called the rules that are actually written down and are called upon by the referees in decisions.To be fair, there is a certain element of subjectiveness, depending on the referee. There is also the subject of intent and many other circumstances to take into account. Even two identical incidents on different days will get results differing from a free kick to a red card.
Actual damage to the player is little to no criterion in how dangerous a tackle or challenge is. I shudder to think how many players teams would 'go through' in a season if physical damage was required in decisions about fouls or punishments.
But I didn't even mention the kitchenEasy.. Sky Sports would fire you for that!![]()
[ASSE]Hinchy;18846066 said:I'm going to say it....
Carrick has played well tonight. Been a rock in front of the defence and not wasteful in possession.
Hopefully I've not just jinxed him.![]()
I'm glad you have such a close relationship with professional referees that you know what they're thinking and apparantly it's not about the rules as set down by FIFA.Unfortunately, whether you agree with it or not, that's the case in a lot of scenarios. Get over it.
I'm glad you have such a close relationship with professional referees that you know what they're thinking and apparantly it's not about the rules as set down by FIFA.
I think you have a future in Sky Sports commentary my son.
Little known fact: since Evra drew blood, this is the first legitimate foul of the game.Spitting blood, I bet that chafed!
Is it really.Get away, it's what we see week in week out in all levels of football!