Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
As much as Wenger is a complete idiot, on second looks at that penalty, Lewandowski might well have been offside when the initial pass went in.
I'll be honest, I can't quite remember how the offside rule works these days. The pass wasn't to Lewandowski but he looks onside when the pass is made, it's then deflected off an Arsenal player and to Lewan who then runs it in. When the deflection happened he's probably onside, he's onside by the time he picks up the ball, but I think that counts as taken advantage of an offside position.
I'm not surprised it seemed overlooked, but the rest of the performance really has no question.
The guys in the studio were saying how were Arsenal so 'good' for the first 60 mins in both games. Why, why were Bayern under so much pressure on the ball deep in their own half? Energy, everyone can choose to expend their 90mins of decent energy for 60 mins of extreme closing and 30 mins of absolutely laughable zonked out awful football. Arsenal did it in the first game, everything was put on Kos being injured but lets be realistic, Arsenal looked tired after 15 mins of the second half and fell to pieces towards the end and somehow Wenger chose the exact same tactic. It was surely easier down to 10 men and without Kos(again) for the final 30, but the abjectly awful performances all around after 60 mins of the game is very easily explainable. It's a crap tactic chosen by a now inept manager. He hoped to do a Liverpool 5-1 against Liverpool, up 4 goals in 20 mins then back off and hope to defend. It backfired spectacularly in the first leg... so he tried it again? Bayern just cruised through the first 60 mins of both games then stayed cruising against a now shattered side.
Once was bad enough, that worked for Liverpool against Arsenal because... it's Arsenal. There was little to no chance of it working against Bayern, he 10 mins ultra effort and see if the surprise works, but when it fails and then ends up in a 5-1 in the first leg, choosing to do it again in the second leg is basically unforgivable.
I'll be honest, I can't quite remember how the offside rule works these days. The pass wasn't to Lewandowski but he looks onside when the pass is made, it's then deflected off an Arsenal player and to Lewan who then runs it in. When the deflection happened he's probably onside, he's onside by the time he picks up the ball, but I think that counts as taken advantage of an offside position.
I'm not surprised it seemed overlooked, but the rest of the performance really has no question.
The guys in the studio were saying how were Arsenal so 'good' for the first 60 mins in both games. Why, why were Bayern under so much pressure on the ball deep in their own half? Energy, everyone can choose to expend their 90mins of decent energy for 60 mins of extreme closing and 30 mins of absolutely laughable zonked out awful football. Arsenal did it in the first game, everything was put on Kos being injured but lets be realistic, Arsenal looked tired after 15 mins of the second half and fell to pieces towards the end and somehow Wenger chose the exact same tactic. It was surely easier down to 10 men and without Kos(again) for the final 30, but the abjectly awful performances all around after 60 mins of the game is very easily explainable. It's a crap tactic chosen by a now inept manager. He hoped to do a Liverpool 5-1 against Liverpool, up 4 goals in 20 mins then back off and hope to defend. It backfired spectacularly in the first leg... so he tried it again? Bayern just cruised through the first 60 mins of both games then stayed cruising against a now shattered side.
Once was bad enough, that worked for Liverpool against Arsenal because... it's Arsenal. There was little to no chance of it working against Bayern, he 10 mins ultra effort and see if the surprise works, but when it fails and then ends up in a 5-1 in the first leg, choosing to do it again in the second leg is basically unforgivable.