Matic has been completely awful this year and no, he's not currently better than Fabregas defensively. But they went into this game a goal down, they started the game losing. More protection would have only made breaking down PSG who were entirely willing to sit back significantly harder.
As for Matic would have gotten back into the swing for a CL tie no problem, based on what, wishful thinking? There are many players who have improved dramatically since Mourinho was fired, Matic is pretty much the only one who hasn't at all. Since Mourinho left Fabregas and Costa have been in brilliant form and most of the rest of the team is playing much much better.
Chelsea did have to try and break PSG down, it's what they've struggled with more than anything this season and Matic/Mikel midfield partnership would have both not been more controlled because Matic is playing like crap and would have made it harder to find a goal.
We'll have to agree to disagree then. Basically 0-0 at 65 mins would have been perfect for Chelsea, use subs to change the dynamic and get that goal. I think that would have been a far better way instead of going all out from the start and allowing open space in behind, just my opinion of course.
Do you think Fabregas is better than Matic defensively when they are both playing to their full potential?
Last edited: