That would involve having to mobilise men from Moscow and St Petersburg too which he currently wants to avoid.
Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar
- Thread starter areksnumbr1sxylady
- Start date
- Status
That would involve having to mobilise men from Moscow and St Petersburg too which he currently wants to avoid.
Soldato
I think the big problem is both sides have seperatist type groups fighting, dont think Russia army has much control over these stowaways actually dont think Russia has much control over it army in general it does what it wants including raping and pillaging.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 3,529
It's impossible to prove anything either way, without independent verifiers- and Russia can't allow that.
I can't see any reason Russia would shell their own fortress. As things stand, they have far more to gain from using it as an operational base.
Soldato
It shouldn't be an operational base at all, it's a nuclear plant.
Both sides should steer well clear of it, which I've said here before, it should be a DMZ.
Both sides should steer well clear of it, which I've said here before, it should be a DMZ.
Caporegime
You're assuming competence...
Soldato
Longer video of a pick up/ATV-mobile anti-tank team from Ukraine's 93rd Mechanized Brigade targeting a Russian T-80BV tank with a Javelin ATGM from July @roblee twitter
Cool video
Cool video
Soldato
https://twitter.com/robleeLonger video of a pick up/ATV-mobile anti-tank team from Ukraine's 93rd Mechanized Brigade targeting a Russian T-80BV tank with a Javelin ATGM from July @roblee twitter
Cool video
Are you sure you that's the correct Twitter handle?
Soldato
Its RALee85 on twitter sorry
Soldato
In Nova Kakhovka, locals report on the arrival of missiles and work of Russian “air defense”. It is also reported about the sounds of explosions is coming from the direction of the dam.
Soldato
Soldato
Yep should be a multinational effort to do that.
You're clutching at straws.
Soldato
Given the fact that the IAEA, despite being an independent body, reports directly to the UNGA and the UNSC, it would make sense for them to ask the Russian politely to **** off and then flood the place with blue helmets and white armour. Never going to happen though, because a.) the UN is way too chicken to get involved b.) they'd waste months/years just talking but doing nothing and c.) Russia would veto any such plan.
We've already seen Russian anti-air do a 180 on their own radar and one reason Russia would like to point a finger at Ukraine is so they can sabotage Western support so they have a pretty big incentive for doing so.
Artillery shells don't do 180's. The nearest Ukrainians positions are 15Km ish away across the river. Not 1Km away. It's not a fast moving front. The Russians artillery seems to have done ok in previous battles.
The Ukrainian soldiers have a pretty big incentive to stop Russians shelling them from around the power plant.
The Russians, as the Ukrainians did before these power plants were captured are making the best cover they can.
Hoping no one is daft enough to go big boom time counter on them...just in case.
Doesn't need false flag to shoot back at someone.
Zelensky could murder his own mother live on TV and the West wouldn't drop their support for him, so na.
The Ukrainian soldiers have a pretty big incentive to stop Russians shelling them from around the power plant.
The Russians, as the Ukrainians did before these power plants were captured are making the best cover they can.
Hoping no one is daft enough to go big boom time counter on them...just in case.
Doesn't need false flag to shoot back at someone.
Zelensky could murder his own mother live on TV and the West wouldn't drop their support for him, so na.
Soldato
Caporegime
Oh, so the Russians were intentionally attacking civilians then? Because I thought that was due to inaccurate fire?
You're not talking about the reactor now...you've changed topics to generally collateral damage/indiscriminate bombardments/targeting civilians with artillery?
If you're still talking nuclear power stations then that was too much of a tangent statement.
Edit - Have changed topic. Yawn.
Last edited:
Caporegime
Not in the slightest. The claims from many were that they hit the civilians areas by mistake. Why does that not apply to the plant?
Because despite artillery systems having a margin of error...it isn't 15Km margin of error on a static front.
Blue on blue mistakes happen...but are rarer when opposing forces are static and separated by considerable distances.
But you know this already....clutching.
- Status