why not get a limited company and you're the director rather then umbrella?
i did the maths for me and i get quite a bit more doing it through my own Ltd. than umbrella
what are the real difference?
back to the question if you know the answer, say i'm contracted 35 hours, if i miss a day then i cannot make that 35 hours.
cheers
what are the real difference?
back to the question if you know the answer, say i'm contracted 35 hours, if i miss a day then i cannot make that 35 hours.
cheers
You don't get paid for them, so whilst a normal week is 35 hours, at 7 hours a day on a bank hol the company will most likely just pay you for 28 hours that week.
Pitfalls of being a contractor, public holidays can be your enemy
Going limited company is more hassle but you get to keep more of your money.
Morba said:If i was to go contracting again, it would be via a normal umbrella if it was short term.
Same here, short term I can't be bothered with the hassle of setting everything up for a limited co, lazy I know
Thats whAt I hoty accountant for
All I have to do is transfer my money from my business account my private account on a Friday
Dunno about tax avoiding tho, this all depends an what point of view you have also in the first 5 years you are pretty save about not getting investigated unless they change the law significantly soon. Since you're not breaking the law as this areA is very grey at the moment
That's for from true and very naive to think that you are safe for 5 years tbh.
Thats whAt I hoty accountant for
how come its naive
i have 1 one year contract which gets tendered every yeat so to speak
claim expenses only for 2 years
its all within the law nothing dodgy here
funny thing is, i work for the government
It's naive because if you think that you are safe then you are a fool. Also there are plenty of instances (go look on cuk) where people have been investigated and they have had to pay back money from a long time prior to the actual year being investigated initially.