Associate
I thought on X79 it was 16x 16x 8x ?
On some boards it is. On my old Gigabyte X79-UD3 it was 16x 8x 16x, on my new Asus P9X79 Pro it's 16x 8x 8x.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I thought on X79 it was 16x 16x 8x ?
I thought on X79 it was 16x 16x 8x ?
I have mine scoring just over 1600 now but everytime it crashes on the end of the last test loading the results page. It did it once but I forgot to take a pic....
I scored 670 points on my system
i3 3220
8GB DDR3
7850 2GB
Does this seem right?
46. Score 717, GPU 7850 @1240/1500, CPU 2500k @4.4, vfdb
47. Score 698, GPU 7850 @1190/1500, CPU Q6600 @3.6, MadMatty
48. Score 696, GPU 660 @1140/1627, CPU i5 3470 @3.2, spixelspixel
49. Score 689, GPU 7850 @1200/1500, CPU i5 760 @4.0, IRLeetly
50. Score 603, GPU 7870 @1110/1300, CPU 2500k @4.6, whyscotty
51. Score 595, GPU 560TI @1025/1225, CPU 3570k @4.5, troops
52. Score 505, GPU 6950 @940/1250, CPU 2600k @4.4, Gammawolf
Quick GTX 690 run. It's not far ahead of Titan on my system.
Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0
FPS:
48.6
Score:
1223
Min FPS:
8.1
Max FPS:
118.0
System
Platform:
Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz (2833MHz) x4
GPU model:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 9.18.13.1090 (1024MB) x2
Settings
Render:
Direct3D11
Mode:
1920x1080 fullscreen
Preset
Custom
Quality
Ultra
Tessellation:
Extreme
wont let me upload mine.
Could you let me know what clocks you are using please.
It was stock 915/1502.
Thanks for the above.
Which do you prefer, the Titan or the GTX 690 ?
Neither really they are both noisy. Tbh on a single 1440p screen my single 680 does perfectly fine for me.