Libya wasn't a war according to the United States. A state of war can only be declared by congress, congress wasn't consulted thus, it was not a 'war'. Nor was it considered such by the UK, France or by NATO. And Clinton's worst atrocities are much worse than that (read: South Sudanese missile attacks). It's true that the GOP and the democrats are mightily close together, but Noam Chomsky (a man with whom I disagree on a whole hell of a lot) makes the observation that a small difference at the top of a system as huge as the US government can have a substantial multiplier effect. However, if you do believe that nothing will 'change' if you vote in a new executive, you're left with having to vote for the best 'person', and in that sense, Obama is a clear victor.
I can't see any formal requests for full recognition in there.