So both TR and also that Xeon-W both have ECC support are both workstation grade chips, the xeon-w is not a server grade chip and you wont find them in the server room. The W literally stands for workstation, the server version of the chip would likely be the Xeon Platinum 8176. I still don't understand the metrics based around your comment, if everything supports ECC on a server grade socket with server grade memory we just end up back to this expectation but once again backed up by zero metrics... So ill ask again what are the metrics? where is any proof that the Xeon platform is more stable than the TRX40?
Let me save you the effort, it isn't and the metrics don't exist. However, i'm open to somebody coming along and trying to prove this.
I was just trying to offer an explanation for the comments,
Do the metrics add up probably not and even if they did it would probably be minor percentages while testing thousands or 10's of thousands of chips over years.
Id expect a £100,000 ferrari to be faster than a 50k bmw, real world millage will vary though. I did say I wouldnt expect any modern chip to be crap though