drdimmer said:EVOII - could you happen to tell us what spec machine that is running on?
No. Performance will be the same between all editionsKainz said:Looks like Home Prem for me. Don't need the additional lark that Uber Super Dooper Ultimate gives me, but I am concerned about one thing, and its a stupid thing - Is there better performance using ultimate then the lower packs? Supersite seems to very roughly suggest that.
EVOII said:AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Epox 9npa Ultra
2 Gig Corsair Value Select
7800 GTX
It's not perfect, but useable. Looking forward to the final release and proper drivers.
Ah exellent news. Wasn't sure about Vista's requirements for this. So my 3700, Epox 9NPA Ultra, 2Gb RAM, x1800 512Mb will be more than fast enough?NathanE said:That system is about 3-4x more powerful than what is required for Vista. The problem is driver support and the fact that pre-release Windows OSes have large amounts of debug code instilled into them.
If you've got a modern graphics card with at least 128MB graphics memory then that system is more than adequate for running Aero Glass.MarcLister said:Ah exellent news. Wasn't sure about Vista's requirements for this. So my 3700, Epox 9NPA Ultra, 2Gb RAM, x1800 512Mb will be more than fast enough?
That pleases me no end, that does.
Cheers NathanE.NathanE said:If you've got a modern graphics card with at least 128MB graphics memory then that system is more than adequate for running Aero Glass.
lol - if the PC consumer market is anything like our end users, it's the snazzy gfx they're after! They see it, think it's all nice and pretty - and subsequently want itPinkPig said:Why? In my opinion it's not an issue in the slightest, people buying a cheap PC to send email with don't care about a snazzy 3D interface, especially since it would push the price up all round.
EVOII said:Looking good here