Permabanned
If thats what you think the situation resembles try rereading this thread or try the one in SCNitefly said:Why is it bad? Sums up exactly what I think.
If thats what you think the situation resembles try rereading this thread or try the one in SCNitefly said:Why is it bad? Sums up exactly what I think.
singist said:At last; someone who the law was brought in for; not the whining non smoking public but the people who work in pubs etc.
james.miller said:As for it being carcinogenic, well that's really irrelivant. if your in public, cars will do you more damage than somebody smoking, ulness your standing next to them sucking up their fumes.
Shifter_Hull said:and i feel that pubs will soon lose a lot of customers and there profits will dwindle to nothing
Nix said:And you don't think that this whole time non-smokers have been inconvenienced by your fellow smokers? Come off it.
Bigstan said:My two main points in this and the many other previous threads in SC on the same subject have been:
1. An outright ban is unnecessary and ill thought out. A compromise could easily have been reached which would have suited all concerned.
2. The vast majority of smokers would have been happy to support legislation if a compromise had been reached. The main reason that this has not happened is because the non-smoking lobby have insisted on an outright ban from the onset and because they hold the majority, that is what will happen. If the non-smokers had been less selfish and been prepared to reach a compromise then everybody could have been accomodated and there would have been much less ill-feeling.
HEADRAT said:Maybe we'll also get less fag butts littering the streets even though every smoker you ever speak to always swears that they put them in the bin and don't flick them out of cars.
Obviously just another part of the conspiracy against smokers, there is a secret group littering the streets with fag butts.
HEADRAT
Piggymon said:Stupid .. bloody stupid
I am speaker from an Ex Smoker's point of view ... been clean for just over a year now
I agree with the ban where food is served ( and I mean proper food, not just crisps or nuts ) even as a smoker I disliked anyone smoking whilst I was eating
But it should be up to the LANDLORD/LADY to decide whether or not they want THEIR pub ( provided it does not serve food ) to be non smoking or not
Quite how the goverment can ban adults partaking in a legal activity is beyond me
Yes it will be nice I suppose to not smell of smoke when I come home from a night out but really what's the big deal .. you wash your clothes ( as you would have had to do anyway ) and also wash your hair ( which again you would have had to do anyway unless you have dreads in which case your hair is gonna stink anyway )
*shakes head*
Rich_L said:Damn, if only I'd agreed with you earlier then I could have been mature and considered too
Bigstan said:You see this people? This is an example of a mature and considered response from someone who doesn't smoke.
She would be happy to be able to go to a pub/club and come home not smelling of smoke but is annoyed that it has to be at the expense of others, including a restriction of the licencee's right to run his/her business as he/she sees fit.
I knew I could rely on you x
Stan