I pay it as without it, I am not allowed to use the road. It's really as simple as that.
Nothing on the roads should be able to use them for free.
Calling it by another name dies not change what it is.
What a waste of time, cyclists already have a head start by virtue of ignoring the red lights to start with!
I pay it as without it, I am not allowed to use the road.
So what? If I don't pay it i'm not allowed to drive my car on the roads. The fact that people out there pay none doesn't stop it being a road tax.
Income tax works by the same mechanism, and is still a tax.
Wouldn't it be safer to give the cars a head start? That way cars are already ahead of the cyclists, rather than doing an overtake.
You are joking, right?
So what? If I don't pay it i'm not allowed to drive my car on the roads. The fact that people out there pay none doesn't stop it being a road tax.
When I visited Cambridge I found that there can be so many cyslists...
The fact that it is judged by emission does not stop it being a tax!.
What was said was that it wasn't a tax to use the road. The missing clause makes all the difference.
Yes you can, you know you can, there are cars on the market that is allowed on the road without car tax or VED or whatever you want to call it.
It's linked to emissions, not a licence to use the road.
[TW]Fox;24785155 said:Cars which have zero rated VED still require a VED License to legally use the road.
And what is the cost of this licence?