Anyway, I seem to be repeating myself somewhat and really I have said pretty much all there is to say....sufficed to say, I disagree with you on several points regarding your assessment of Beckham and the way in which you assessed relative attributes across disparate players and playing styles to try to illustrate it.
On the general point that some players are better than others, have different work ethics, playing attributes, that some need to work harder than others to attain the same level of play etc...I do not disagree., only that Beckham necessarily falls into the latter category.
It really doesn't matter what YOU THINK, I have repeated several times now that I wasn't in any way comparing position, I've made this clear as day how and why I was comparing them. Even if you misunderstood I've now several times over explained that I was NOT comparing positions, and you are still saying you disagree with how I compared positions? Here's a hint, if I said beckham isn't known for his strength, and Toure is... and it helps massively in Toure's game... then you might have a point. However I only compared the fact that player X is known for his strength vs player Y who wasn't known for his strength.
Oh look remove the name and you see the point, a player known, or not, for his strength, his name, position is utterly irrelevant. You WANT it to be relevant because when you decided to argue the toss over my saying Beckham wasn't known for his strength, you had no leg to stand on because its as absurd as saying Beckham is known for his header.... oh wait you did that too, its as absurd as saying Beckham didn't have to work harder than everyone else to get where he was despite basically everyone in the football world saying he worked much harder than everyone else.... damn. Since you made such ridiculous bold claims you've tried to misinterpret every single thing I've posted to somehow make your initial claims less ridiculous.
Here's another hint, even if I did compare the position of players, it would make my argument weak, it wouldn't make your defence of Beckham's physical abilities any less ridiculous
You are however distracting everyone very competently, so congratulations on being one of those guys who argues through circles of obtuse minutiae
But they only thing that really matters is I said Beckham wasn't known for his strength and you argued and suggested he was known for his strength and headering.
FOr the record, check the link again, it gives AVERAGE position in a game as well as starting position, his AVERAGE position throughout the whole game is inside the centre circle. He does drift right sometimes, he drifts forwards, back and left also... which is why his AVERAGE POSITION through the whole game is bang on central midfield.
