Sounds slightly like communism, but not.How about some kind of system where people recieve credits based on how much work they do, and the worth of the work they do? The credits could be exchanged for goods & services; and those with more credits could get better goods, quicker, at the places which cost more. More credits, that is. The place which cost the most credits could be called Waitrose. I call this system: Creditism
Sounds slightly like communism, but not.
How about some kind of system where people recieve credits based on how much work they do, and the worth of the work they do? The credits could be exchanged for goods & services; and those with more credits could get better goods, quicker, at the places which cost more. More credits, that is. The place which cost the most credits could be called Waitrose. I call this system: Creditism
Wouldn't work quite that way when not everyone gets the same breaks in life now would it? Think it through.
Goodness, you're right. Are you saying Creditism would be inherently unfair?
I think I may well be old bean. Tip tip.
How about some kind of system where people recieve credits based on how much work they do, and the worth of the work they do? The credits could be exchanged for goods & services; and those with more credits could get better goods, quicker, at the places which cost more. More credits, that is. The place which cost the most credits could be called Waitrose. I call this system: Creditism
So waddyou suggest? The governing system could give out credits to let people looking for work survive, I suppose... but what if they went and spent all their credits at the pub? Also, what if the owners of credit worked together to exploit the under-credited class - the creditariat? My this is getting complicated.
Yes, a Credfair state would definitely be a bonus, although the nature of people ultimately means that it will nevertheless be abused by some, and thus the state should be more heavily involved in closing areas of manipulation.
Rather than throwing large proportions at credit at those who were fortunate enough to be in such a position, I would advocate a more even distribution. Although in reality such a system would be open to mass-corruption, and as such I would instead suggest that those who have more credit instead share it through their own omission with those who don't have enough credits to allow mobility. The state could help through identification of such areas, hot-spots and individuals.
I would push for the elimination of all credisocracy remnants which promote such unbalances in the first place.
Oh come on, give me some credit.![]()
I've forgotten what I was trying to make fun of