Yes you can, real life isn't all about specific detail, sometimes it's about generalisation and approximation. Like "99 red balloons" and "Nine Million Bicycles". You don't need to be so precise, we all know precise rules tend to be useless.
Andi.
Are you trying to say what we say in a court of law needs to be more truthful than what we publically tell others face to face, on the phone or on the internet?
Correct, if someone starts a sentence with "i heard" or "apparently" most people have learned to take the rest of what he says with a grain of salt, at most you might point out you've heard differently, not call him a liar and start demanding evidence rofl.
If it was the head of a rival AIO company saying they heard EK coolers leak then yeah you might have cause to be a little more suspicious, but not a fella just letting people know his new fans are cool.
Ah! the courts where, I understand, so much talk makes so much money trying to twist peoples words. Not trying to find out the truth just a different definition
Andi.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.