What a *******!

Permabanned
Joined
28 Oct 2006
Posts
6,552
Location
Bournemouth
Nobody wants to consider giving the police a portion of the blame for fishtailing him at 80+ mph?

Obviously the guy was an utter tool for stealing a car and then attempting to evade the police, but the motorway isn't exactly the most suitable place to try to bring a car to a "controled stop". Basic physics suggests loss of control will ensue. I'd be interested to see what police guidelines are situations such as this. Anyway, the IPCC is investigating the situation and I'm sure they will have all the facts.
 
Tbh they should've just let him die while making the peugeot driver was as comfortable as possible.
 
Nobody wants to consider giving the police a portion of the blame for fishtailing him at 80+ mph?

Obviously the guy was an utter tool for stealing a car and then attempting to evade the police, but the motorway isn't exactly the most suitable place to try to bring a car to a "controled stop". Basic physics suggests loss of control will ensue. I'd be interested to see what police guidelines are situations such as this. Anyway, the IPCC is investigating the situation and I'm sure they will have all the facts.

Nobody is to blame but the driver who stole the car.

And for your information, I think you'll find a motorway is THE best place to bring a vehicle to a 'controlled stop'. ;)
 
Nobody wants to consider giving the police a portion of the blame for fishtailing him at 80+ mph?

Obviously the guy was an utter tool for stealing a car and then attempting to evade the police, but the motorway isn't exactly the most suitable place to try to bring a car to a "controled stop". Basic physics suggests loss of control will ensue. I'd be interested to see what police guidelines are situations such as this. Anyway, the IPCC is investigating the situation and I'm sure they will have all the facts.

You do know its only America that uses the retarded fishtail method right? Most country get several patrol cars and box him in then slow down to a stop, hes obviously been so stupid that hes tried to go up the grass verge resulting in him flipping. Are you seriously suggesting the police just let him swerve in and out of traffic on the motorway? That would still potential cause fatality's.
 
Nobody wants to consider giving the police a portion of the blame for fishtailing him at 80+ mph?

If they are not at fault why should they face blame? For the sake of someone needs to be held accountable? It's not fishtailing; it's surrounding the car and coming to a stop.

The manoeuvre is done all the time with great success, we don’t know what caused the car to flip over, so lets wait and see if it was a mistake of somebody in the manoeuvre, the criminal or negligence with the state of the barrier.
 
i dont want him to live have a record - claim ben cos no one will hire him - or have a disability so that he can claim for even more.
over dose of aneastetic will do nicely for me!

its cheaper than fillnig up a jail with his sorry excuse for existence.
 
If they are not at fault why should they face blame? For the sake of someone needs to be held accountable? It's not fishtailing; it's surrounding the car and coming to a stop.

The manoeuvre is done all the time with great success, we don’t know what caused the car to flip over, so lets wait and see if it was a mistake of somebody in the manoeuvre, the criminal or negligence with the state of the barrier.

Indeed. Even if it were a 'mistake' of somebody performing the TPAC, it's still nobodies fault besides the guy failing to stop.

If he didn't try to run he wouldn't have killed an innocent MoP.
 
Nobody is to blame but the driver who stole the car.

And for your information, I think you'll find a motorway is THE best place to bring a vehicle to a 'controlled stop'. ;)

*shrug*

The guy who stole the car instigated the chain of events, but there were many other factors in the chain which ended with the death of an innocent road user. For example, it was the decision of the police officers to 'bring the car to a stop' in a particular way *at that exact time* that lead to the flip, and the crash with the car in the oncoming lane.

I'm not trying to say that the police officers were at fault neccesarily, or that they did anything wrong. None of us have enough information to make this statement (or otherwise) - that's the job of the IPCC. But to suggest that the stealing of the car was the only event of significance which lead to the death of the Peugeot driver is a fallacious argument.
 
Nobody wants to consider giving the police a portion of the blame for fishtailing him at 80+ mph?

Obviously the guy was an utter tool for stealing a car and then attempting to evade the police, but the motorway isn't exactly the most suitable place to try to bring a car to a "controled stop". Basic physics suggests loss of control will ensue. I'd be interested to see what police guidelines are situations such as this. Anyway, the IPCC is investigating the situation and I'm sure they will have all the facts.

Nope if this ******** didn't steal the car and refuse to stop then an innocent person wouldn'tve been killed.
 
Back
Top Bottom