Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Over the last 20 years or so i've probably had about a 50/50 split of ATI/AMD and Nvidia. I can't say that i have ever had an issue with any of the GPU's when they were "current". What i will say though is that it's clear to me that Nvidia "nerf" the drivers for EOL cards to lower performance in relation to what ever is the latest card.
For a very long time i had 1080ti and performance actually got better with drivers until the release of the 2080ti. Within a month of the 2080ti release, every new driver release saw worse performance with the new 1080ti drivers.
This has never happened with ATI/AMD. In fact, the opposite has happened. That's why i'm now back with AMD for my GPU.
That's a good point, and one I missed. I find it hard to believe nVidia just focusing on driver support for new GPUs would actually degrade performance of older GPUs -- but that's what seems to happen with the older cards. If you look at a lot of newer reviewers that include GTX 1080 tis, for example, they're performance has somehow gotten worse over time in the same games -- there's really only one way that practically happens. On the other side, there's a common adage that "AMD drivers age like fine wine".
I remember owning a Nvidia Geforce 4600 TI and replacing it with a 9700 Pro from ATI (which later became AMD). Playing Battlefield 1942 with the 9700 Pro I noticed all the textures that had been missing with the Nvidia card. Huge areas with the Nvidia card were simply untextured as Nvidia decided it was OK to cheat with AF so they didn't lose as badly in benchmarks. Nvidia will use every dishonest or underhand tactic they can and rip off their consumers by doing so without remorse or even shame. Only had one card ever fail on me a 1080TI but overall had 50:50 from each vendor and generally good experiences from both.
A few others have recommended a wrapper for OpenGL to Vulkan
Over the last 20 years or so i've probably had about a 50/50 split of ATI/AMD and Nvidia. I can't say that i have ever had an issue with any of the GPU's when they were "current". What i will say though is that it's clear to me that Nvidia "nerf" the drivers for EOL cards to lower performance in relation to what ever is the latest card.
For a very long time i had 1080ti and performance actually got better with drivers until the release of the 2080ti. Within a month of the 2080ti release, every new driver release saw worse performance with the new 1080ti drivers.
This has never happened with ATI/AMD. In fact, the opposite has happened. That's why i'm now back with AMD for my GPU.
I've never personally had any driver issues with the older AMD Radeon/R9 cards, nor the 970. They may be more problematic on the more recent cards, which I'd kind of expect for a while...Had an RX580, worked really well, very happy. Now have a 3070 FE, works really well and also happy. Honestly, I think the whole AMD v Nvidia thing is a load of rubbish, both are great.
Bigger problem these days is finding an affordable one at all.