I've probably made several errors in this post and if somebody tells me so in a polite manner than I'll attempt to assimilate that knowledge rather than getting my panties in a twist because somebody who knows better decided to tell me I'm wrong, but hey, if you feel comfortable in your ignorance, carry on.
To be honest, if you feel belittled by somebody pointing out your failure to grasp the english language in it's written form and further take offence at it being pointed out (with the caveat that it does depend on how it's worded) then you have issues and it's your problem, not the person who is attempting to show you correct useage.
To be honest, if you feel belittled by somebody pointing out your failure to grasp the english language in it's written form and further take offence at it being pointed out (with the caveat that it does depend on how it's worded) then you have issues and it's your problem, not the person who is attempting to show you correct useage.
It all comes down to brain cycles, it takes more brain cycles to decipher someone's terrible English than it does to read perfectly¹ written English. People do not like it when they have to do extra work because others feel they can not or do not have to.
Imagine if you worked with an idiot at your workplace who did the same amount of work you did but finished it badly and you had to correct all of his mistakes. You would most certainly not be happy.
Just playing devil's advocate here.²
¹ Or at least a GCSE level of understanding.
² I do not claim to type perfect, error free English.
Let's being honest here, such corrections on the forum are rarely ever polite. And I mean verging on never.
It all comes down to brain cycles, it takes more brain cycles to decipher someone's terrible English than it does to read perfectly¹ written English. People do not like it when they have to do extra work because others feel they can not or do not have to.
Imagine if you worked with an idiot at your workplace who did the same amount of work you did but finished it badly and you had to correct all of his mistakes. You would most certainly not be happy.
Just playing devil's advocate here.
It all cemos dwon to biran cleycs, it tkeas mroe bairn cycels to dhpecier sneomoe’s tlirerbe Eilgnsh tahn it deos to raed pelercfty wrteitn Einlsgh. Polepe do not lkie it wehn tehy hvae to do ertxa wrok bsecuae oerths feel tehy can not or do not hvae to.
Ignmaie if you werkod wtih an idoit at yuor waokprcle who did the smae aonumt of wrok you did but fisiehnd it blady and you had to cceorrt all of his mesiatks. You wuold msot cneartily not be hppay.
Jsut pianlyg dviel’s atoadcve hree.
OMG my Brain cycles !!, can I has them back please !!
Since you are asking for a correction the first time you wrote "it's" the correct option is without the apostrophe as "its" is by itself possessive (which is what you are trying to show) so all you need know is the one form there. Apostrophes can of course denote possession of items e.g. Dave's bike or a contraction as you've used above for "...how it's worded" but not in the extant case. If you are unsure then just do a quick test in your head, would you replace "it's" with "it has", "it was" or "it is"? If not then you don't need the apostrophe.
For "usage" you drop the "e" in the middle. Hope you don't mind the above but it might help.
It wsnat hrad to udnretsnad etiehr was it.
*sgih*