Soldato
Unfortunately not true, council budget's are strictly controlled and are set. Thus road safety projects are ring fenced under a different budget from road repairs. Council budgets have been reducing for years yet demands have gone up.In a small town near me the council spent loads re-installing those square speed humps (the old ones fell apart after only 2 years. Also they put them so far apart everyone just drove between them). But didn't repair the potholes on the rest of the road.
Councils do have the money, they just don't spend it on the right things and waste it on stuff no one asked for.
Unfortunately not true
I am sure you can work this out for yourself?I've spent the last two weeks driving around Ireland, and even on the non toll roads it is a million times better than UK roads. The toll roads at 2-3 Euro a pop are just brilliant. Really not looking forward to getting back to the mess that is the UK road network tomorrow
I rather have the roadworks going for an extra 2 days, doing a proper job/use better quality materials, than the repeat 6-9 months later.I don't understand why (assuming contractors repair the road), they don't have some sort of clause that it has to last a reasonable amount of time (I don't want to use the word warranty, but essentially that for roads). If councils are using their own people, then surely it pays in the long run to spend a bit more time/effort doing it right so it doesn't need redoing in 6 months.
as Nasher implied pot-holes themselves represent a safety problem - if you didn't have to spend time watching for pot-holes you'd have even more attention on the pedestrians,Unfortunately not true, council budget's are strictly controlled and are set. Thus road safety projects are ring fenced under a different budget from road repairs. Council budgets have been reducing for years yet demands have gone up.
Would you rather council's took money away from social care so you have an easier time driving?
Innner tubed has now been patched again, but like the roads, it's been repaired too many times and I need to replace it completely (something in Kevlar?)then surely it pays in the long run to spend a bit more time/effort doing it right so it doesn't need redoing in 6 months.
Any Safety argument has nothing to do with how pothole repairs are funded. As I've clearly indicated funding for pothole repairs come directly from the government thus councils cannot take money from other budgets. Not that they have any to do so, as again provenas Nasher implied pot-holes themselves represent a safety problem - if you didn't have to spend time watching for pot-holes you'd have even more attention on the pedestrians,
second bicycle puncture in as many months two days ago at the leisure centre not sure which of the cinema/fast food places sells stuff in glass.
Innner tubed has now been patched again, but like the roads, it's been repaired too many times and I need to replace it completely (something in Kevlar?)
Seeing a lot more sunken manhole / drain covers around. Not sure why that is.
It needs it though, smooth concrete is very slippery when wet, plus you'd have loads of standing water.Though this road surface is old. In parts of Leicester, they have huge concrete slabs on the road. The other day I was driving on a road never been on before and it felt horrible. Turns out the concrete has ridges in it.
maybe we need more concrete like the USA (ready for global warming too) and lasts for years.It needs it though, smooth concrete is very slippery when wet, plus you'd have loads of standing water.
are you saying the new A14 around st Ives/Huntington is a concrete surface? if so I would happily see new roads replaced with that surface, it's a great road to drive on and given the load on it must be hard wearing too.
never got out of the car to see if A14 surface looks like this