I would say I'm starting to feel this, too. However, I'm 35 at the moment and realise this is my time to get to as high up as I can in my career. I would like to make sure I can have more work life balance in the future though. I got approached about a new role yesterday (I only took this one about a year ago from contract to perm) and while it would take me up another level at a really good company, it would mean significant travel (it's actually UK based and we're not interested in moving back) so it's that balance between my current long days (8am - 6pm, sometimes 8pm working hours), but at home, with no commute and even "post covid" my office is 20min ride away - vs. a lot more travel, time away from home etc.However I'm 100% happier with less income, my work life balance is better despite a more senior role and some non exec stuff as well. I actually get to spend time with my family which is actually worth every penny. I'm less stressed although sometimes random bills can come out and **** with that zen feeling!
This is also so very true. But at the same time you could argue that this doesn't always have to be the case. You could live in an apartment, in a cheaper area, have a less nice car, not go on as many holidays etc. but the fact is, the more you have the more that goes!The higher income you have the higher outgoings you will tend, as a general rule, to have (mortgage, council tax, car(s), bills) etc.
No. Not at all. There are people earning over 50k a year who are not "doing well" and are stuck in rent traps with little disposable income. It completely depends where you live and your circumstances and dependents etc. A better term would be "household income". Someone might earn 40k but be struggling to raise a family. Where as a household that both earn 40k giving a combined 80k might be "doing well".
Massive differences across the UK based on location.
This is also so very true. But at the same time you could argue that this doesn't always have to be the case. You could live in an apartment, in a cheaper area, have a less nice car, not go on as many holidays etc. but the fact is, the more you have the more that goes!
Ultimately it's all relative isn't it?
The higher income you have the higher outgoings you will tend, as a general rule, to have (mortgage, council tax, car(s), bills) etc.
This is also so very true. But at the same time you could argue that this doesn't always have to be the case. You could live in an apartment, in a cheaper area, have a less nice car, not go on as many holidays etc. but the fact is, the more you have the more that goes!
Our joint household income is around £95k and I certainly wouldn’t say we feel that well off. Two kids (with related childcare expenses) and a fairly large mortgage takes up a fair chunk of our take-home!
That's far from it. I know I can as well as the mother offer my children more than what happens at nursery. It is simple milestones but my daughter learned how to swim, ride a bike before the vast majority of her peers and she only did the 15 hours a week. She was also always top of her class so do not understand your argument tbh.
It's like you have to go up to the higher salary and more stress to appreciate life with a little less $$ but way less stress, to really appreciate that though. At the same time, be able to afford that. It's not like you see many people saying that if the numbers you mentioned were 1/3 of that you know?We just about pull six figures household income now. No kids. No car finance. No debts. Modest house in the midlands with a cheap mortgage. I am much happier with this setup than when I was earning a lot more.
Ah, as my mate refers to as a DINK
Double Income No Kids. Basically the demographic he's most jealous of
I found a weird blip between 30k (London) and significantly more (say 100k). At 30k you are used to not having what you want and getting on with it. Between 30-100 (arbitrary number) you seem to spend astronomically because you remember what it was like to be skint all the time so you indulge often. My savings went off a cliff the second I had a bit more coming in. I've only just 'somewhat' recovered the situation. I picked 100k because from then on you are battling a reducing personal allowance and therefore heavily incentivised to top up pensions.
If you are mortgage free, have no debt then I am sure most people would have a similar outlook to yourself. I am in my late 30's and would love to be in a position where I am able to get a lower paying less stressful job that allows me to spend more time with family also. However having to pay mortgage (in London) and childcare etc is all very expensive and neither me nor the Mrs can afford to cut back on the salary, if anything we are trying to up it so that we can afford a move out to a bigger house
I’ve stepped out of large corporate life for something that supports my work life stress balance better. It hasn’t impacted my earnings but just means I’ve more control and more influence and don’t feel the never ending burn. At 53 it’s about more than money and that ladder, its about setting one up for retirement.Not mortgage free but we're not paying high rates (recently re-mortgaged and saving over £500 a month!!). For 20 months it was all on my salary which was quite tough. We do have equity spread around though and stuff abroad (I'm a foreigner after all! ) but that's not cash, so I just forget those assets and focus on the current.
We have 2 kids, so have some childcare to consider as well, and had a lot more to consider previously when we relied on childcare more. It does get easier as the kids get older. However, we only have 1 car, and only go on 2 holidays a year, we don't live a frivolous lifestyle.
As I said I don't want to be crass. But I'm in my 40s with quite a long career behind me so I'm probably not the typical demographic.
However I'm 100% happier with less income, my work life balance is better despite a more senior role and some non exec stuff as well. I actually get to spend time with my family which is actually worth every penny. I'm less stressed although sometimes random bills can come out and **** with that zen feeling!
I guess it goes back to the original post shared above; it is all relative. I remember arguing with a senior that I was happy and comfortable on 30k, and how could I possibly need anymore? I had also set the 40% tax bracket as a safety point. Not sure how I made it work tbf; I was living in Zone 1 at the time and have been paying for a car since I was 19.I kind of felt that 30+ was the tipping point.
I've basically moved up from 28-44 in 3 years by literally just changing jobs and finding one with a new skill. So many regrets about my early career where I stayed on 24k for ages because I was 'comfortable' and liked the people. What waste
Since 30+k I've just put excess into s&s and other schemes. Never thought I'd be on 44 when I left England on sub 30 in 2019 to move to Wales.
I get the sentiment but folk should be thinking about retirement well before 53I’ve stepped out of large corporate life for something that supports my work life stress balance better. It hasn’t impacted my earnings but just means I’ve more control and more influence and don’t feel the never ending burn. At 53 it’s about more than money and that ladder, its about setting one up for retirement.
Tend maybe, but not a rule. I have done that in the past....but it seems a bit daft, especially with the stress that comes with 100k+ jobs.
We just about pull six figures household income now. No kids. No car finance. No debts. Modest house in the midlands with a cheap mortgage. I am much happier with this setup than when I was earning a lot more.
Ah, as my mate refers to as a DINK
Double Income No Kids. Basically the demographic he's most jealous of
Ah, as my mate refers to as a DINK
Double Income No Kids. Basically the demographic he's most jealous of
Ah, as my mate refers to as a DINK
Double Income No Kids. Basically the demographic he's most jealous of