Whats better for folding, core duo or Xeon's

The MacPro uses Woodcrest Xeon processors, it has 2x Dual Core 2.66 cpus, I know for Boinc Seti its pretty much unbeatable 1500+RAC, id expect Folding to be a similar story, im just waiting for an OSX intel folding client to be released and ill be able to give you figures.
 
Just to confirm. Get the Core 2 Duo.

My single 1.66GHz Core Duo smacks my Dual Xeon into the middle of last month. Even allowing for the fact that I have the older-model Prestonia Xeons by halving the frame times (seems like a reasonable approach), it still wins. Even allowing for the fact I'm under-utilising my Xeons by taking a third off again, it still (just) wins.

Now take a Core 2 Duo which performs about 20% faster than the equivalent Core Duo (Intel figures), ramp up the clock, bear in mind the Core 2 Duos can score fantastic overclocks, and you'll be smashing those Xeons into last year.

PS - XP Pro allows two sockets. I'm not sure if it imposes a limit on cores/socket or not.
 
I am running 2 woodcrests at 3ghz on an Intel 5000x chipset and in sandra they get 300,000 on integer and 180,000 on floating which I think is pretty impressive.
 
Have not really benched it yet or done any folding to tell you the truth as I more into using the thing then running benches.

What are the best ones to run ?

<edit>Of course I probably should not be posting here as I know zilch about DC, but I saw a mention of woodcrest :)</edit>
 
Back
Top Bottom