27 Feb 2014 at 17:18 #21 Razor-BladE Razor-BladE Soldato Joined 15 Feb 2009 Posts 4,298 Location Bristol Aye
27 Feb 2014 at 17:19 #22 ThundyCat ThundyCat Commissario Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 53,642 Location Down under mate! Razor-BladE said: Aye Click to expand... Under advanced search? Raymond Lin said: It's happening again...no answers from mods? Wedding photos now against the rules ? Click to expand... Nothing has happened.
Razor-BladE said: Aye Click to expand... Under advanced search? Raymond Lin said: It's happening again...no answers from mods? Wedding photos now against the rules ? Click to expand... Nothing has happened.
27 Feb 2014 at 17:54 #23 Razor-BladE Razor-BladE Soldato Joined 15 Feb 2009 Posts 4,298 Location Bristol Ah interesting. No, I was searching using 'Search this forum'. The advanced search seems to be working fine with all threads there.
Ah interesting. No, I was searching using 'Search this forum'. The advanced search seems to be working fine with all threads there.
27 Feb 2014 at 18:15 #24 Burnsy2023 Burnsy2023 Man of Honour Joined 17 Nov 2003 Posts 36,746 Location Southampton, UK Raymond Lin said: So much for that thread a few weeks ago about transparency. Click to expand... Or perhaps not?
Raymond Lin said: So much for that thread a few weeks ago about transparency. Click to expand... Or perhaps not?
27 Feb 2014 at 18:58 #25 Russinating Russinating Soldato OP Joined 27 Dec 2005 Posts 17,315 Location Bristol Weird. I was specifically looking for An Exception's threads before and all his images have been deleted. Example: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18558455. Might just have been him doing it though. I swear when I searched before there was less than 1 page from the last 3 months as well. Nevermind! Also, found the watermarks ruling thread, huzzah! http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18494951. So am I correct in thinking logos are ok so long as they don't have a URL in them? One to kick things off, albeit a video still!
Weird. I was specifically looking for An Exception's threads before and all his images have been deleted. Example: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18558455. Might just have been him doing it though. I swear when I searched before there was less than 1 page from the last 3 months as well. Nevermind! Also, found the watermarks ruling thread, huzzah! http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18494951. So am I correct in thinking logos are ok so long as they don't have a URL in them? One to kick things off, albeit a video still!
27 Feb 2014 at 19:07 #26 fiveub fiveub OcUK Staff Joined 12 Apr 2008 Posts 49,306 Location OcUK HQ Watermarks are fine. As long you are not actively trying to gain a sale. For example saying "BOOK ME NOW! BUY MY PHOTOS!" So URLs logos are fine etc.
Watermarks are fine. As long you are not actively trying to gain a sale. For example saying "BOOK ME NOW! BUY MY PHOTOS!" So URLs logos are fine etc.