It's not possible to check every post in every thread.
If there are posts you have a complaint about then you're free to report them using the RTM function.
Indeed, and on at least one occasion some very personal remarks were deemed perfectly acceptable by the mod who received the RTM's....presumably because the subject matter was something they had a vested opinion on or for some other reason, but as personal attacks on members are specifically prohibited I find it ironic that on occasion they are ignored or deemed ok for some reason.
The point stands.
Indeed, and on at least one occasion some very personal remarks were deemed perfectly acceptable by the mod who received the RTM's....presumably because the subject matter was something they had a vested opinion on or for some other reason, but as personal attacks on members are specifically prohibited I find it ironic that on occasion they are ignored or deemed ok for some reason.
The point stands.
Personally, i think people need to lighten up and grow thicker skin. If you can't stand abit of abuse from a random on a forum them you shouldn't mingle with society. Also i see the comments regarding "that thread" and whilst they were distasteful its by far from the worst stuff i have seen posted on here regarding murder, rape, sexism etc.
Just let it be a free for all and be done with it![]()
People have feelings. You don't expect to come online in forums and get abuse off people. Simple as that really.
People have feelings. You don't expect to come online in forums and get abuse off people. Simple as that really.
People have feelings. You don't expect to come online in forums and get abuse off people. Simple as that really.
I've naturally been doing this a fair bit recently, shame a lot of the stuff I've reported never gets touched and I had to resort to emailing Thundy about one of them.If there are posts you have a complaint about then you're free to report them using the RTM function.
No the thread was suitable, the comments were unsuitable, hence why people were deservedly suspended. Laughing at how a child was brutaly murdered, is not suitable for this forum and everyone knows this, hence the suspensions for breaking the rules.
Craterloads;23324261Are you still upset over the Fox thread comment said:You broke the stated rules of the forum, yet because a mod shared your unfounded bias those rules were ignored. A personal attack on the integrity and character of another member is supposed to be prohibited, It is a simple as that.
FAQ said:We also expect members to behave respectfully and not launch personal or abusive attacks on other members.
What you actually think or say is pretty irrelevant to the point being made as I was not referring to you in particular.
You don't expect to come online in forums and get abuse off people.
Those are matters you should discuss privately with the Mod in question.
Then simply delete the offending posts that cross whatever line it is that is being enforced. Irreverence is not immoral or particularly offensive, and from what I have heard some of the comments were very mild compared to some of the posts we see in GD. Given the number of suspensions in what was a short-lived thread it seems that the whole thing was somewhat overcooked.
You broke the stated rules of the forum, yet because a mod shared your unfounded bias those rules were ignored. A personal attack on the integrity and character of another member is supposed to be prohibited, It is a simple as that.
Depends on the topic, if you enjoy brutalizing defenseless animals, then you should expect some stick when sharing your barbaric opinion online.
Not quite. If I say that someone lacks any sense of a moral compass, I can justify it and it's part if a wider discussion, I don't see a problem. If it's a straight insult, then it will be removed as it serves no purpose.
Not always it seems.....It appears totally dependent on the personal affectations of the moderator rather than the application of the rules themselves and their is a distinct difference from questioning someone's morality with specific justifications explained and some of the comments that were (and are) bandied about.