Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 11,742
- Location
- Northern Ireland
Pickers said:Fixed![]()
I was going to agree with you.....then I realised that its an insult.
![Frown :( :(](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/frown.gif)
Pickers said:Fixed![]()
If read backwards, the phrase "now live" answers the question: "In the battle between good and evil, who was victorious?"
True False
Pudney@work said:I believe on those type of tests the average is from 90-100, whereby the majority of the population will end up, as you say they're normalised hence this is where the majority should be by definition.
(The following numbers apply to IQ scales standard deviation σ = 15.) Roughly 68% of the population has an IQ between 85 and 115. The "normal" range, or range between −2 and +2 standard deviations from the mean, is between 70 and 130, and contains about 95% of the population. An accurate score below 70 may indicate mental retardation, and a score above 130 may indicate intellectual giftedness. Retardation may result from normal variation or from a genetic or developmental malady; analogously, some otherwise normal people are very short, and others have dwarfism. Giftedness appears to be normal variation; autistic savants have often astonishing cognitive powers but below-average IQ's.
It has been observed that scores outside the range 55 to 145 must be cautiously interpreted because there are smaller numbers of respondents with which to make comparisons in those ranges. Moreover, at such extreme values, the normal distribution is a less accurate estimate of the true IQ distribution.
atpbx said:I got a 113.
W0ot!
But in controlled scientific test when i was 9 i actually got 250, the man said i could afford to cut half of my brain out and give it to a monkey and still be considered to be a genoius.....jeanious.......geanyus.........
A very clever person.