When are you going fully electric?

Not really sure why we are comparing a Volvo to a Porsche here? Not sure it’s really where people would go either for entry into EV. Sdk is this a polestar ‘lock in’ thing? It’s a completely different sized car and half a ton more.

When I said the polestar 2 was tiny in the back you said it didn’t matter to you. So why do you need a bigger car? Looks like a polestar2 performance is quicker?

I’d be buying an ipace over a polestar3. For its drive Dynamics rather than numbers game.
 
decline of the pound/£ , and future projections are probably contributory, we should have a Biden'esque credit for any EV's 'made' in the UK
 
Not really sure why we are comparing a Volvo to a Porsche here?

This isn't a comparison to Porsche - it's coming from where Polestar aimed the pricing at for their future models in their 2021 Business plan presentation. Here is the slide.

52376313518_e8029e00a6_b.jpg

When I said the polestar 2 was tiny in the back you said it didn’t matter to you. So why do you need a bigger car? Looks like a polestar2 performance is quicker?
I’d be buying an ipace over a polestar3. For its drive Dynamics rather than numbers game.

As for why I want one - it’ll probably be the only time I can afford a fast luxury big SUV, so why not !!
 
Last edited:
Every time I look at an electric car that's worth getting I see the price at 10x my current car.

And I think... Not any time soon. I'd say 5 years minimum. When am I going to have 30k sitting around when I have a 200k mortgage?

I'm not.

When are second hand electrics worth getting going to be 5k?
Not any time soon.

(note. I need a car with a decent amount of space.)
 
Last edited:
A good scientific and mathematical look at EVs by Dr Kipping.


For me until solid state batteries for EVs are common place, I doubt I will get an EV.
 
For me until solid state batteries for EVs are common place, I doubt I will get an EV.

Why does the specific battery technology matter?

You can already charge a current gen EV from 10-80% in about 18 minutes on existing tech. Thats adding 180ish miles of range after already driving 220+ miles which is around 6-8 hours of driving.
 
Why does the specific battery technology matter?

You can already charge a current gen EV from 10-80% in about 18 minutes on existing tech. Thats adding 180ish miles of range after already driving 220+ miles which is around 6-8 hours of driving.
Because it's several minutes as opposed to tens or minutes. And solid state batteries are lighter, last longer, smaller packaged and thus can be denser = More EV range as the technology gets more and more adopted.

As well as all that, solid state batteries are considerably safer. https://www.samsungsdi.com/column/technology/detail/56462.html?listType=gallery

Edit* Not forgetting being easier to recycle more efficiently (no need for liquid chemical separation stages...).

I see no point in getting an EV now (for me and at the current prices) only to then get another EV with solid state in say, 5 years time. I don't change cars every 2-3 years like some do. 8 years+ is fine by me, for the right vehicle.
 
Last edited:
.. or

bmw Aug 4
"In our view, hydrogen is the missing piece of the puzzle that can complement electromobility places where battery-electric drivetrains are unable to gain traction," Zipse said on the company's earnings call on Wednesday.

The first cars on the Neue Klasse platform are due in 2025 and will initially include a sedan similar in size to the 3-Series midsize car and a "sporty SUV," Zipse said on the call. "We could also imagine a hydrogen drivetrain for this new vehicle generation," he added.

BMW will start limited production at the end of the year of a hydrogen fuel-cell version of the X5 large crossover, called iX5 Hydrogen. "We are already thinking about a possible next generation," Zipse said.
..
Filling up the tanks takes three to four minutes, BMW said.
 
Because it's several minutes as opposed to tens or minutes. And solid state batteries are lighter, last longer, smaller packaged and thus can be denser = More EV range as the technology gets more and more adopted.

As well as all that, solid state batteries are considerably safer. https://www.samsungsdi.com/column/technology/detail/56462.html?listType=gallery

Edit* Not forgetting being easier to recycle more efficiently (no need for liquid chemical separation stages...).

I see no point in getting an EV now (for me and at the current prices) only to then get another EV with solid state in say, 5 years time. I don't change cars every 2-3 years like some do. 8 years+ is fine by me, for the right vehicle.

Other than charging speed, none of that has a material benefit to you as the end user.

I'm sure someone will come along and correct me, but I'm not aware of anyone having a solid state battery on the cusp of going into mass production, let alone finding its way into a car.

Even if they bought a solid state battery pack to market that could in theory be re-charged in 5 minutes, you'll not actually be able to do it in reality because of the practical realities of power grid and the CCS connector. 9.6 minutes is the quickest that you can theoretically extract 56kwh (e.g. a 10-80% charge for a 80kwh pack) from a 350kw rapid charger. The DNO's are already having a mare connecting up 350kw chargers in any significant volume with most requiring battery buffers already, I can't see there being an appetite to go faster any time soon.

The main benefit of waiting 5 years will be choice but I wouldn't be making any bets that anything game changing will be happening in that time. I'd even argue that we don't need it to go any faster, we really need it to get significantly cheaper.
 
Last edited:
Even if it's just for the range of choice (and obviously cost significance) in 5 years then that's fine, but the infrastructure needs be there too. I don't want to have to plan out specific routes just to hit charging points along the way. At the moment the M3 gets me over 400 miles on a long run, 300 miles if I add some spirited driving into the mix. Until that's easily possible on an EV I just won't be interested. If you add spirited driving onto an EV the range drops even further as well. If I am to replace the fun, interactivity and drama of ICE, then the compromise of those losses by going EV need to be made up for in other ways, like superb range from a full charge, even with spirited driving.

There is a battery that was put into a Model S that gets 750 miles on a charge, something like that, or even 500 miles+ would definitely be interesting however and more than make up for the above stuff.


ONE calls its experiment with the Model S a proof of concept for a future battery technology called Gemini, which it hopes to put into production after 2023. The company says its battery chemistries are “safer” and “sustainable,” and use a “conflict-free supply chain.” ONE uses a lithium iron-phosphate (LFP) chemistry, which historically has lower energy density than cobalt- or nickel-based chemistries.
Excellent science with stuff like that.
 
You don’t get a EV for spirited drives. If a battery can do 750 miles. Why not have half the weight for 375 miles ?
 
Last edited:
I've had an i3 for a weekend, granted no sports car, but I have EV experience. But that's besides the point, you said you don't buy an EV for spirited driving, which is incorrect information, because you can and people do, and makers have models that do cover that.
 
Back
Top Bottom