Maybe that Price is the reason why they still listing 10+ instock
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Where Are Those 26 Core CPU's?
- Thread starter ScottMC7000
- Start date
Associate
I can agree, had a few over the years!
Deleted member 66701
D
Deleted member 66701
Maybe that Price is the reason why they still listing 10+ instock
I don't think price has anything to do with how many are in stock
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/inte...ocket-lga1151-processor-retail-cp-64n-in.html
vs
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/inte...ocket-lga2066-processor-retail-cp-65q-in.html
Permabanned
how? 2 > 4 > 8 > 16 > 32 > ect...
or do you mean 2 > 4 > 6 > 8 > 10 > ect... (do we have 10, 12 or 14 core cpu's?)
It was a calculation of years.
As for your question, yes
Intel 14 Core Xeon Gold 5120 Server/Workstation CPU/Processor
Intel Xeon E5-2697V2 CPU (2.7GHz, 12 Core, 24 Threads, 30MB Cache, LGA
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Processor - (16 Core/32 Threads)
I found a 26 Core CPU
An Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8164 Processor
Launch Date: Q3'17
Last edited:
Soldato
I believe Broadwell-E introduced the first consumer 10 core CPU with the i7-6950X, and that was launched at nearly $1600 according to reviews. Intel then jumped up with Skylake under the i9 brand of up to 18 cores, which then seems to have stopped with the high end due to chasing AMD on the mainstream socket.
Permabanned
other than single and the AMD x3 line, was there any other odd core count cpu's?
i my mum had an phenom 2 x3 710 in an home pc for ever ago. it was a good idea but short lived
i my mum had an phenom 2 x3 710 in an home pc for ever ago. it was a good idea but short lived
Threadripper. I think they have gone quiet on 7nm Threadripper just because of the scale of awesome it is going to reach, but AMD could easily be releasing a 32 core desktop CPU this year. Obviously there is also EPyc... but I m not sure if that counts.
Permabanned
Infant see that happening. I thought 16c32t with the most we are going to see.
Soldato
This requires a new dedicated thread? A flippant comment. really?
Soldato
Mainstream desktop sure. "High-end desktop" we already have 32 cores in the Threadripper 2990WX. Threadripper 3 could be 48c/96t or even 64c/128t if they max out the chiplet count.
Soldato
No reason why they wouldn't, Zen 2 is PCIe 4 after all. And Threadripper is largely a cutdown EPYC anyway.
Soldato
Dualcore CPU's first came out in around 2006 but it's been some 13 years now since then, so doing some simple math, we arrive at 26 cores
So what's happened...?
We have 64 core CPU's with 128 threads now.
What what holds everything back is Windows.
Soldato
It really is about about time that MS got the issues with the Windows scheduler sorted once and for all. Linux has no such issues at all, so why with all the resources of MS can't they get it right
Soldato
Because they've had no need to, not because they can't. MS and Intel have always been bedfellows and Intel haven't had CPUs with sufficiently high core counts for the Windows scheduler to cause a problem, so out of sight is out of mind. And with my limited experience, anybody who deploys servers with high core counts don't use Windows software.It really is about about time that MS got the issues with the Windows scheduler sorted once and for all. Linux has no such issues at all, so why with all the resources of MS can't they get it right
Soldato
It really is about about time that MS got the issues with the Windows scheduler sorted once and for all. Linux has no such issues at all, so why with all the resources of MS can't they get it right
The issue with Microsoft is they do not want to. The company tries to sell its Server licences per CPU. With high count core CPU's in the server market they make a killing because is used on big fat workstations also not servers.
What would happen if Microsoft puts the Windows Server scheduler on the Desktop windows? With AMD on the roll churning out new high core/thread cpus at that speed, it would make the windows server for workstations usage null and void. The most lucrative of the MS sale portfolios, since it has lost a big chunk of proper servers to Linux.
You can see the tests from last year. Is the desktop scheduler having the issues, not the Windows server one.