Which is best?

It depends. If he has little/no interest in PCs and doesn't have a PC that he can just stick a 5770 in then I would say he might be better off just getting a PS3.
 
It is a problem, these threads do nothing but turn civilized denizens who normally hold hands under the rainbow into savage barbarians.

It needs to be a suspendable offence in my opinion, included in the forum FAQ.
 
Without being a fanboy (Current a 360 gamer with a bit of PC gaming on the side):

PC = Best
PS3 = Next
360 = Last

However they all have "excellent" graphics in my opinion.
 
Hi,

Would you please help solve a current argument with a mate of mine.

Which offers the best graphics between the xbox 360, ps3 and a pc with a very high end graphicd card?

I vote PC

Matt

PC?? Are you being serious?! How on earth does the PC have better graphics over the 360 and PS3?! :confused:
 
Megadrive

Serious answer:
Of course it'll be the PC, the very high end graphics card will cost more than both the PS3 and 360 combined so it would be mental if it didn't outperform them.

Expensive item in outperforming cheaper item shocker.

Not really true because you can build an entire PC for less than £300 that'll run Crysis very nicely on the likes of high settings. Your claim of the graphics card alone costing more than a PS3 and 360 combined is way off. :p

Gone are the days of needing a £400 graphics card to max games out. The fact is aside from Metro 2033 not much else has pushed graphics to the next limit on PC yet. :cool:

Edit: Oh and my answer to the OP is ; PC > PS3 > 360 :)

Edit #2: Actually it was like, a year and a half ago I built a system for less than £300 that was 'Crysis ready' so now you can probably get even better bargains! (8800GT was an amazing deal back then though)
 
Last edited:
Doesn't change the fact that crysis is poo though :P

You can get a 360 for £99 without a hard drive, so it is an inexpensive device relative to a decent PC, for £99 out of the box (give or take the price of a hdmi/vga cable) I'd say it has very good visuals. I wouldn't dispute the fact that a decent PC doesn't cost as much these days as they once did, but as you said, that's probably because PC game graphics and improving exponentially anymore.
 
It's blatantly false, I would barely get the power supply for a Crysis PC for £300!

How? 8800GT with a Core 2 Duo doesn't need an expensive power supply and I would imagine that the replacement/equivalent of the 8800GT uses even less power.

I ran my 8800GT on an £40 AKASA.
 
Not really true because you can build an entire PC for less than £300 that'll run Crysis very nicely on the likes of high settings. Your claim of the graphics card alone costing more than a PS3 and 360 combined is way off. :p

Reread the op, he said very high end graphics cards, these cost £4-500. I did not put that much thought into the matter as frankly its so obvious the PC is technologically superior that it doesn't require the effort :p
 
Reread the op, he said very high end graphics cards, these cost £4-500. I did not put that much thought into the matter as frankly its so obvious the PC is technologically superior that it doesn't require the effort :p

I guess it depends what your definition of very high end is, a Radeon 5850 is nowhere near £500. :) Though if he was referring to dual cards then that's a whole other matter. :o
 
I guess it depends what your definition of very high end is, a Radeon 5850 is nowhere near £500. :) Though if he was referring to dual cards then that's a whole other matter. :o

Surely everyone's definition of very high end is the very most expensive/high performing cards? Either way, any interpretation of the term very high end will result in a graphics card that costs more than either console.
 
Back
Top Bottom