Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
So you've already tested it? Have you got any benchmarks handy?
No, what I did was, rather than listen to Intel fanboys, or AMD fanboys, I listened to WHAT INTEL HAVE SAID IVYBRIDGE IS!.
Its not a new architecture, its a tick, or a tock, whichever is the shrink with little change. Intel have already told us, 10% faster, of which just over half is IPC, the rest is clock speed. So we're basically look at a 3.6Ghz chip, which will be as fast as a 3.7Ghz Sandybridge, with a 50% bigger GPU, which will do exactly sweet nothing in 99% of your average OCUK gamers computers.
Will Intel underestimate or undersell their products and blow us away....... no, Intel firstly don't do that, secondly its 99% just a shrink thirdly, it follows every single rumour, to the letter, over the past year +.
Ivy bridge is a 98% known quantity, will FMA3 and XOP make a humoungous difference, some, in limited capacity, FMA4 + one of the best features removed = FMA3, XOP, 400% faster in operations that use XOP well, thats only part of encoding, it made a difference on Bulldozer and will make a bigger difference as proper encoder guys tweak software more than quickly hacking it in, but its not a game changer.
Will anyone notice 10% more performance on a Ivybridge, especially the majority of people who game.... who aren't even close to the CPU limits anyway.
I wouldn't buy a Sandy over a Ivy if both were out, I certainly wouldn't wait 6-8 months for a 10% performance improvement, if we were within 2 months of launch I might say wait, just incase any mobo issues pop up and you need a certain version of a mobo, also because there might be a few cut price 2600k's around.
A cut price 2600k with hyperthreading WILL spank a 3500k without hyperthreading in everything that uses more than 4 threads, which is a growing percentage of all apps.