Consoles are for sure to blame for the PCs state would you not agree on that point ? before the 360/PS3 people would have to go for a PC no ?
I don't agree at all to be honest. Consoles may have turned people away from PC gaming but it's not necessarily their 'fault'. PCs turn out rubbish profits (unless you're blizzard or valve), whether that be due to piracy or just falling popularity is not something i'm not going into, but because of that developers are jumping ship. But is that the fault of consoles? Not really imo. It's the fault of the people downloading every game they can, the developers who put on overly restrictive DRM, the hardware manufacturers that release buggy drivers, the developers who release buggy games, all of these things are the 'fault' that has driven many away from PC games.
I'd say i'm a console gamer these days, true i still have a 8800GT and a core2quad, but back in the day i'd have had a i7 equivalent and a GTX280. Why don't i have those these days? Because consoles have more games, many of which i view as better than those that the PC has offered in a while. Who do i blame? Pirates and developers, they've both screwed themselves over.
I still think sony and MS insist that there's no pc version or if there is they must delay it.It's in sony and microsofts interest that the pc version is delayed or not released more so than the profit they'd make on pc sales.
MS maybe as games like Mass Effect were pushed back despite being a Microsoft funded project and others such as Halo 3, Gears of war and fable 2 despite the large number of people using Windows as a gaming platform so i'll give you that one. But Sony no, they make the vast majority of their exclusives themselves so they're well within their rights to withhold their own titles from whatever platform they like. They may deliberately hold titles back, but why the hell shouldn't they? It's their project, their funding and they have no stake in the PC market what so ever.
Coupled with releasing a single player based game on pc is like throwing money down the toilet these days.
I disagree tbh, The Witcher is one of the biggest success stories on the PC in a while and that was single player only. Action games do very much need to be multiplayer though on the whole, i assume you're thinking of the upcoming release of the ghostbusters game which has multiplayer cut from the PC release? In which case i completely agree, insane decision.
Look at the recent battlefield 1943, what other possible reason is there that the pc version isn't out til september other than sony and MS insisting they do delay it.So they get all the sales in first and another trend is making the pc version not as good online as we have seen with sfIV.
Again this is an EA decision, they simply know that more money will come from the console release and so poured more time and money into developing it. I wouldn't be surprised if Sony and MS actually rely on EA to release games for them, not vice versa as you seem to indicate in the above quote, they don't call the shots on EAs games, EA do.
Last edited: