The irony is that because this is GD, trying to put humour into a serious subject is par for the course.
Except the humour - "I had a bacon sarnies" is seen by the militant vegan as some provocation.
The reason this thread is in GD? Because OP's initial original post/title was baiting meat-eaters, to provocating a response, rather than a sensible discussion.
Just lock this thread now, it's only a vehicle for the OP to keep calling other people abusers of animals...which does nothing but get people to eat another bacon sarnie.
Somewhere between the militant strawman vegan arguments and the 'I had a bacon sarnie' edgelords is the scope for a decent discussion on the topic, however this is GD, what else did we expect.
Oh look Raymonds back and is repeating the same thing ive refuted about 4 times xD
Heh, So posting pictures of steak or "bacon tho" is a rational argument is it? It's purpose is to provoke you know it as much as I do. Luckily im not easily offended and up till now have completley ignored those kinds of posts.
Just to be clear - this wasn't a single mods decision but it went to a discussion within the team first.
Your OP and title were inflammatory, designed purely to provoke a reaction rather than debate. That's not an SC worthy thread and thus moved to GD.