For me where it falls down is that for it to actually be worthwhile, you need to satisfy ALL of the following:
a) You need to be involved in a non-fault accident
b) That you couldn't reasonably avoid yourself
c) That leads to unclear liability from the circumstances of the crash
d) Which is then followed by a denial from the other party
Then and only then the dashcam comes in useful but given how rare even a) on it's own is, let alone satisfying every other criteria, is it really worth videoing your entire driving life?
From the other angle do we really like the idea that every time we go for a drive we appear in loads of random peoples videos, of which potentially at least one could be an irritating YouTube vigilante who takes offence at even the most reasonable of driving manoeuvres he perceives to be 'wrong'?
I dunno really, I can absolutely see the appeal but just wonder where it stops..
As for the rear facing ones, blimey. The chances of a rear ending accident where they hit you ending up in a huge liability dispute is even more rare, it's fairly difficult to pile into the back of somebody and get taken seriously when you feign innocence! Yet we have people like Burnsy fretting that 720p for his rear facing camera just didn't offer the right amount of quality!!! Better quality than broadcast TV from 5 years ago just won't cut it for a rear facing dashcam

If I lived in Russia I'd be ordering one tomorrow because the entire motoring climate just seems completely different over there.
a) You need to be involved in a non-fault accident
b) That you couldn't reasonably avoid yourself
c) That leads to unclear liability from the circumstances of the crash
d) Which is then followed by a denial from the other party
Then and only then the dashcam comes in useful but given how rare even a) on it's own is, let alone satisfying every other criteria, is it really worth videoing your entire driving life?
From the other angle do we really like the idea that every time we go for a drive we appear in loads of random peoples videos, of which potentially at least one could be an irritating YouTube vigilante who takes offence at even the most reasonable of driving manoeuvres he perceives to be 'wrong'?
I dunno really, I can absolutely see the appeal but just wonder where it stops..
As for the rear facing ones, blimey. The chances of a rear ending accident where they hit you ending up in a huge liability dispute is even more rare, it's fairly difficult to pile into the back of somebody and get taken seriously when you feign innocence! Yet we have people like Burnsy fretting that 720p for his rear facing camera just didn't offer the right amount of quality!!! Better quality than broadcast TV from 5 years ago just won't cut it for a rear facing dashcam


If I lived in Russia I'd be ordering one tomorrow because the entire motoring climate just seems completely different over there.
Last edited: