I dont like that dx10 is only for vista forces u to upgrade regardless if u want to play new dx10 games. Why should M$ force all gamers to upgrade OS to play games that M$ did not even make?
I dont care for new graphical interfaces, I have win XP running like win 98 would look with no fancy options ect. I see no reason to waste CPU cycles or any of my 2Gb ram on something that I ignore completely.
Then I thought, lets take a look at the selling features of this OS. I googled it and read "new fancy graphical user interface" (see previous paragraph), secondly it said "the most secure windows ever".
The most secure windows ever sounds great but unfortunately I had previously just been reading this:
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
which amoungst other things says that the security is for the "content providers", no effort has been made to stop spam emails or further effort to stop virus' from working. Its just made digital rights management hard to copy. As a side effect, since there is an underlying encryption service between output deivices and media content, then the CPU is more heavily taxed. Not only that but the device drivers themselves poll at 30ms if the device is digital or 150ms if analogue... just to check nothing is happening, AKA idle. ....Just a sanity check, lets wait and see what the benchmarks are between vista and XP (or just see what the top orb users use for an OS, they usually know what they are doing).
Then u have just 1 random quote from another forum:
"Vista will regard your system as new if you install a new piece of hardware at ITS discretion. You will not receive notification as to whether it will be recognised as such beforehand, and manufacturers of hardware will not be under any obligation to provide this info. You have three installs of Vista when you buy the product. Some rumours say it has to be a new motherboard, others that it need only be a new mouse or keyboard - perhaps even whenever the "new hardware found" wizard boots up. One user, trying the Beta version in Germany, was unable to install all his hardware before it ran out! He installed Vista, then installed his DVD drive, then his graphics card, then his modem - when he then tried to install his digital camera via USB, the license immediately revoked - this on a Beta version! As a nice little follow-up, when he tried to reinstall XP back again, he couldn't, and ended up having to completely reformat his hard disk in another machine before it became usable again.
I think we are supposed to buy prebuilt systems, at MS's whim, and never touch them - they have better control then.
I say enough. These b£%^£"!s must not win."
Not only that Vista costs near enough double what it does in the US.
Plus M$ is just trying to entrench themselves into a deeper more far reaching monopoly.
I couldnt use Vista's features even if I wanted to. I paid £270 for a monitor, the last 1 I had for 5+ years, it doesnt have the required DRM. I paid £270 for a graphics card which also doesnt have DRM compliance and isnt dx10 compatable either.