Why should i overclock & The risks.
- Thread starter phi1
- Start date
The difference between the fps at 1.86ghz and 3.1ghz is negligable in games, oh wait, that's what got me like 40% more fps 
Not too hot on graphics cards, but I doubt the performance increase will be that big until you get the better card (as you said you would). But in any case, try it and see what the performance is like
Just follow the DS3 thread and you'll be fine, all layed out for you. Having never overclocked before just following that thread made it as easy as pie!
Not too hot on graphics cards, but I doubt the performance increase will be that big until you get the better card (as you said you would). But in any case, try it and see what the performance is like
Just follow the DS3 thread and you'll be fine, all layed out for you. Having never overclocked before just following that thread made it as easy as pie!
Last edited:
How so? if i'd got a 6300 it would have been a true allendale
the new ones are,only the old batches are speedbinned chips.
I fail to see how a 6300 is any better than a 4300 at 3.2 -3.4ghz.
Whatever the cheapest that gets you stable and cool at 3.4 ghz is fine
i think and they are merely a stopgap until the new chips arrive anyway so..
either will do IMO but if price is important i'd go for 4300.
the new ones are,only the old batches are speedbinned chips.
I fail to see how a 6300 is any better than a 4300 at 3.2 -3.4ghz.
Whatever the cheapest that gets you stable and cool at 3.4 ghz is fine
i think and they are merely a stopgap until the new chips arrive anyway so..
either will do IMO but if price is important i'd go for 4300.
Last edited:
