Was meant as a tease... didn't come across that way, here have the missingJohnnyboy said:Yes, my mistake. Post edited.


Was meant as a tease... didn't come across that way, here have the missingJohnnyboy said:Yes, my mistake. Post edited.
Funny, Zelda TP on my Wii is outputting at a confirmed 480p (EDTV resolution). How does that work then, eh?Spike_UK said:I'm not sure how Gamespot made Zelda look like that as the PAL version doesn't support the HD/EDTV mode.
Kreeeee said:Funny, Zelda TP on my Wii is outputting at a confirmed 480p (EDTV resolution). How does that work then, eh?
I think the XD3 engine on my LG 37LC3R does an amazing job on the Wii and makes the games look amazing. This is comparing it to XD3 off and a Samsung LE32R74.
Surely you mean tellys with crap component input rarther than crap tellys? Seeing as many manufacturers dont make much effort with the 'lower' input quality.Kreeeee said:I love how people state opinions as facts, especially one as bold and blatantly false as that.
As said on poor TVs there is little difference but on decent set the component signal is far superior.
I've got both the offical RGB and component cables and whilst there is hardly anything in it I'd say the component was just that little bit shaper.mrgubby said:I would be very interested if anybody could get there hands on both the RGB-Scart and the component cables for the Wii and do a comparison.
RGB goes through less convertion steps so "should" give better results but obviously this will all depend on the TV .
I've tried my Wii on an LE32R74 samsung, an LG 32LC2DB (That went pop and was replaced by: ) and an LG 37LC3R. All of them showed a huge difference between component and composite, especially on moving/noisy scenes like all of zelda and red steel.BoomAM said:Surely you mean tellys with crap component input rarther than crap tellys? Seeing as many manufacturers dont make much effort with the 'lower' input quality.
My telly, one of the popular Sammys, shows almost no difference in IQ betweeen composite & component.
The only difference i could see was that component showed more alaising. Composite isnt anywhere near as bad as people make out, if their telly has good composite inputs. Which your Sammy there does.Kreeeee said:I've tried my Wii on an LE32R74 samsung, an LG 32LC2DB (That went pop and was replaced by: ) and an LG 37LC3R. All of them showed a huge difference between component and composite, especially on moving/noisy scenes like all of zelda and red steel.
Edit: Switchin from composite to component in all cases was like removing a fuzzy veil from the screen. Everything was noticeable clearer and more vibrant.
It wasn't mine.BoomAM said:The only difference i could see was that component showed more alaising. Composite isnt anywhere near as bad as people make out, if their telly has good composite inputs. Which your Sammy there does.
whitecrook said:Hang on, surely the difference between RGB and component is the quite major fact that RGB is interlaced, whereas the Component is progressive? Surely this should be the clincher?
Unless these new fangled HDTVs perform deinterlacing similar to Dscaler, but even still I A) haven't heard anyone mention that feature on TVs, and B) 480p native should still be better than deinterlaced 480i.
...
We'll have to agree to disagree there im afraid.Kreeeee said:It wasn't mine.
I know precisely what I saw and no amount of convincing on the contrary will make me believe my eyes are broken.
Look closely at the cursor when in the menu and move it around. That's the nasty blurring effect on a very small scale. When the whole screen is moving it looks horrible. Progressive helps this immensely and also increases the colour depth and black levels to boot.
Syph said:Component at 60hz is 720x480 (480p60). Composite at 480i is 640x480 still, if at 60hz. If 50hz, it's 576i... as I understand it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/480p
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/480i
Yep.BoomAM said:We'll have to agree to disagree there im afraid.