It's not a measure of the poor individuals as people, just an attempt to disincentivise poor people having children and incentivise wealthier people.
It takes a lot of investment to raise a child in to a productive contributing adult. Trying to do that starting from abject disadvantage is, in many cases, a lost cause. We may be better off focusing our efforts where there is a greater chance, and one way to 'filter' here is to start with those with wealthier parents. They will likely have more stability, better nutrition, better access to education, greater exposure to culture, travel etc. If we put resources in to encouraging these people to raise more children, we may get better results than providing child support to those who are very poor, only for them to mostly produce similarly disadvantaged children.
1957? Don't you mean 1977?
phased out as a necessity of life and homosexuality is being influx as a choice of life. Gone are the days when adolescents having their first sexual attractions initially tried to like girls, and only turned gay if it didn't work. Now it's a choice and they're both normal, a kid growing up will think "ah I remember that guy saying liking boys is normal" and will initially start having homosex with his buddies rather than even trying to get a girlfriend for heterosex..
So when did you chose to be straight?
This is just poorly veiled homophobia in my eyes.
Good lord.
Did I say people choose to be straight? No.
Did I say homosexuals choose to be gay? No.
I said people can choose to be gay.
I didn't say people cannot be born gay.
You understand now?
so right now you can choose to be gay?
as in seriously be attracted to and have feelings for men?
.
Did I say homosexuals choose to be gay? No.
I said people can choose to be gay.
No. I'm well passed the age of sexual exploration and maturation.
So you're saying that people choose their sexuality up until a certain age then it's fixed forever?
Did you consciously choose to be straight?
also seriously if you've already finished your "sexual exploration" damn the rest of your life is going to be pretty bland and repetitive.
You aren't born with a drug addiction, even though it becomes the norm of your life.
One can be furiously masturbating one day and suddenly realise he's sexually attracted to feet. Just like the Duncan James example above realising he is attracted to boys too.
Oh dear no. I'm just saying it's possible. Just possible.
Look at sexual fetishes. How do they come about? Surely you aren't born wanting to suck feet? Certain events happen during growth, certain thoughts occur, hormonal imbalances. Whether it's concious or subconscious... This is what shapes your sexual desire.
One can be furiously masturbating one day and suddenly realise he's sexually attracted to feet. Just like the Duncan James example above realising he is attracted to boys too.
No one can be genetically homosexual or heterosexual. It's genetically impossible to be homosexual or heterosexual. Genetically, it's as simple as the sperm and the egg, that is all. Mental attraction is just that, Mental. The type of women you like, your fantasies and fetishes, and whether you like boys or girls is all down to the events in your life. These "events" can happen even when you're a year old which is why people commonly think you're born gay.
You cannot be technically born gay or even straight for that matter.
If one can master his own mind, he can choose to not do the drugs he's addicted to right? You aren't born with a drug addiction, even though it becomes the norm of your life.
I hope you can somewhat understand my ramble.
About 50% of gays is determined in the womb by chemicals/genes and the other 50% is a result of childhood sexual abuse.
I do find it quite worrying what the gays have been doing to this country.
yes you can, there's been plenty of cases where babies have been addicted to herion and alcahol or what ever else the mother has been taking.