I woke up this morning
My baby was gone
I woke up this morning, Lord
My baby was gone
My kind of woke....
You woke up this morning
Got yourself a gun
Your mama always said you'd be the chosen one
That's mine
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
Last edited:
I woke up this morning
My baby was gone
I woke up this morning, Lord
My baby was gone
My kind of woke....
That judge is a racist.
Link?That judge is a racist.
Rather say why they think a person’s set of action or/and views is bad/wrong, that person is just labelled as woke, often without any justification.
If you think something it’s wrong, it helps to explain rather than just calling it “woke”, leftist or left winged.
Get off Twitter. Its ruining your perspective.
Three women have been found guilty of terrorism offences despite "no evidence" of support for Hamas.
Convicting them at Westminster Magistrates' Court, Deputy Senior District Judge Tan Ikram said: "Seven days earlier, Hamas went into Israel with what was described by the media as paragliders.
"A reasonable person would have seen and read that.
"I do not find a reasonable person would interpret the image merely as a symbol of freedom."
But Mr Ikram, delivering his verdict, said: "I want to be clear, there's no evidence that any of these defendants are supporters of Hamas, or were seeking to show support for them."
He said he had "decided not to punish" the defendants, and handed the trio each a 12-month conditional discharge.
"You crossed the line, but it would have been fair to say that emotions ran very high on this issue," Mr Ikram said.
"Your lesson has been well learned. I do not find you were seeking to show any support for Hamas."
nope.. at no point in those x posts calls the judge woke.. you questioned if the judge was woke without putting your own case forward.Try reading the OP in addition to the title then, it's kinda laid out there for you.
The BBC the other day gave a decent overview of the verdict
![]()
Pro-Palestinian protests: Paraglider badge wearers found guilty
Despite the ruling, a judge did not find evidence that the woman were in support of Hamas.www.bbc.co.uk
So the takeaway is that it is fair to say that they were wearing the image in support of the attack. However we cannot conclude that they support Hamas just because they support the attack that Hamas did? :|"I do not find a reasonable person would interpret the image merely as a symbol of freedom."
But Mr Ikram, delivering his verdict, said: "I want to be clear, there's no evidence that any of these defendants are supporters of Hamas, or were seeking to show support for them."
nope.. at no point in those x posts calls the judge woke.. you questioned if the judge was woke without putting your own case forward.
What could be behind this??? Oh... good old wokeness:
The BBC the other day gave a decent overview of the verdict
Well I assume there was actual testimony and evidence which showed they weren't Hamas supporters.
“I do not find a reasonable person would interpret the image merely as a symbol of freedom.
“I want to be clear, there’s no evidence that any of these defendants are supporters of Hamas, or were seeking to show support for them.”
Ikram said he had “decided not to punish” the defendants as he handed them each a 12-month conditional discharge.
Reacting to the verdict, the Crown Prosecution Service said displaying the images amounted to the “glorification of the actions” of Hamas.
"Far woke" was the latest LOL buzzword I read.The word has lost its meaning and now I see it whenever someone kicks up a fuss, they are called woke. Regardless whether it has legitimate basis.
"Far woke" was the latest LOL buzzword I read.
because your getting your sources from flipping TWITTER. How is that hard to understand?How is it ruining it? If you don't thnk there is something wrong here then perhaps you could explain? Though maybe it's your perspective that's the issue if you think this is fine.
The word has lost its meaning and now I see it whenever someone kicks up a fuss, they are called woke. Regardless whether it has legitimate basis.
Weren't the police officers retired at the time of the 'offences'? And even if they weren't it would seem that disciplinaries from their employer would be more appropriate than a court.No idea what you're ranting about sounds like utter BS but regards the court case its the difference between an angry mob that are riled up and police officers who have a professional duty of care and a responsibility not to do dumb crap.
because your getting your sources from flipping TWITTER. How is that hard to understand?
For example the judge didn't give the 6 formers officers sentences because they were just posting 'memes', They themselves admitted they were posting racist messages in the group and the entire reason everyone ended up finding out about it is because one of the members had a falling out and went to the press to highlight how bad it was...![]()