Work unit P2605, 1760 points...

I just had my first SMP stopped, as it failed to meet the deadline. Has anybody else been struggling. I have been fine for the last couple of weeks.
 
rincinDub said:
I just had my first SMP stopped, as it failed to meet the deadline. Has anybody else been struggling. I have been fine for the last couple of weeks.
Click to expand...
not had any issues!
 
rincinDub said:
I just had my first SMP stopped, as it failed to meet the deadline. Has anybody else been struggling. I have been fine for the last couple of weeks.
Click to expand...
Mine runs close to the preferred dealine with these larger WUs - [email protected]
Also since they use more of the CPU there's not enough slack to make running my GPU client worthwhile.

If this is the way things are going I may have to go dual-boot sooner than expected :o :p

edit: That's on 24/7 and hardly any gaming or other CPU hungry activities :eek:
 
Last edited:
That doesn't sound right, or maybe it does
.8 extra = 16% faster
60sec less = 14% increase in proformance
£200+ = 300% the cost :eek: ... cheap chips for the win :D

What chipsets/Mobo are you boys running your C2D on and ram/hhd would be nice too.
 
shadowscotland said:
That doesn't sound right, or maybe it does
.8 extra = 16% faster
60sec less = 14% increase in proformance
£200+ = 300% the cost :eek: ... cheap chips for the win :D

What chipsets/Mobo are you boys running your C2D on and ram/hhd would be nice too.
Click to expand...

Gskill HZ running at 900

Nvidia 680i chipset (EVGA)

WD Raptor 10,000 16mb cache

any ideas, I am running mine through VMware??

Stelly
 
I get anything from 14 mins to 22 mins a frame in VMware with two running

Code: 
[16:20:09] Writing local files
[16:20:09] Completed 135000 out of 500000 steps  (27 percent)
[16:41:48] Writing local files
[16:41:48] Completed 140000 out of 500000 steps  (28 percent)
[17:03:04] Writing local files
[17:03:05] Completed 145000 out of 500000 steps  (29 percent)
[17:23:51] Writing local files
[17:23:51] Completed 150000 out of 500000 steps  (30 percent)
[17:37:55] Writing local files
[17:37:55] Completed 155000 out of 500000 steps  (31 percent)
[17:59:00] Writing local files
[17:59:00] Completed 160000 out of 500000 steps  (32 percent)
 
Got this for a nasty nil points! :(

[16:12:34] Completed 465000 out of 500000 steps (93 percent)
[16:34:46] Writing local files
[16:34:46] Completed 470000 out of 500000 steps (94 percent)
[16:56:59] Writing local files
[16:56:59] Completed 475000 out of 500000 steps (95 percent)
[cli_1]: aborting job:
Fatal error in MPI_Sendrecv: Error message texts are not available
[0]0:Return code = 0, signaled with Segmentation fault
[0]1:Return code = 1
[0]2:Return code = 0, signaled with Segmentation fault
[0]3:Return code = 0, signaled with Segmentation fault
[17:02:30] CoreStatus = 1 (1)
[17:02:30] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0x1
[17:02:30] Deleting current work unit & continuing...
[0]0:Return code = 0, signaled with Quit
[0]1:Return code = 0, signaled with Quit
[0]2:Return code = 18
[0]3:Return code = 0, signaled with Quit
[17:06:53] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[17:06:53] + Attempting to get work packet
[17:06:53] - Connecting to assignment server
[17:06:54] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.56).
[17:06:54] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[17:06:55] Loaded queue successfully.
[17:10:56] + Closed connections


Just my luck!
 
Concorde Rules said:
22 mins a frame with two running on a 430x8 Conroe.
Click to expand...

Getting 22mins a frame running two just now however I'm running 9x355, for some reason I can't boot up with 400x8 or 7x400 however I can run the ram upto 475 on a divider or run it at 3-3-3-3-12 at 355 (G Skill HZ ram) so not sure whats stopping it.
 
Dangerous Dave said:
Getting 22mins a frame running two just now however I'm running 9x355, for some reason I can't boot up with 400x8 or 7x400 however I can run the ram upto 475 on a divider or run it at 3-3-3-3-12 at 355 (G Skill HZ ram) so not sure whats stopping it.
Click to expand...

What Mobo?
 
Stelly said:
hmm do you think its limited in some way??

Stelly
Click to expand...
75% cpu use, yeah guess so.
wonder why they don't have it using 100%?

guys doing two cores, 22+ mins a frame is bad surly?
if I get 7-9mins a frame with 1, unless I'm gonna get 18-20mins at the outside it would be bad?
also I'm running a normal core aswell using the spair!
 
VeNT said:
75% cpu use, yeah guess so.
wonder why they don't have it using 100%?

guys doing two cores, 22+ mins a frame is bad surly?
if I get 7-9mins a frame with 1, unless I'm gonna get 18-20mins at the outside it would be bad?
also I'm running a normal core aswell using the spair!
Click to expand...


Im running two...
 
VeNT said:
two SMP cores,
but your two cores take more than double my single core.
Click to expand...


:/ well I am using the PC aswell.

Project : 2605
Core : Gromacs SMP
Frames : 100
Credit : 1760


-- SMP1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 22mn 29s - 1127.23 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 29mn 20s - 864.00 ppd


-- SMP2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 22mn 50s - 1109.96 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 29mn 55s - 847.15 ppd


:confused:
 
VeNT said:
75% cpu use, yeah guess so.
wonder why they don't have it using 100%?

guys doing two cores, 22+ mins a frame is bad surly?
if I get 7-9mins a frame with 1, unless I'm gonna get 18-20mins at the outside it would be bad?
also I'm running a normal core aswell using the spair!
Click to expand...
you talking about the same WU's here? The p2605 seem to use most of the CPU time (90-95%) wheras the p3025 which everyone was getting before was only using around 75%

However you're probably right about not running two of these more demanding ones together as there could easily be some bandwidth issues
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom