World War 3

willhub · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:12

The Mad Rapper said:
We won't be alive for WW3. Planet X will smash into us in 2012 (or whenever it's supposed to be) and we'll all be toast man

Planet X does not exist, but we're supposed to change into a higher form of life, I for one think a load of nukes will be set off.. or nothing will happen.

Tefal · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:13

sr4470 said:
What about the underground nuclear test?

What about it?

how exactly are they going to attack anyone with a large bomb without strategic bomber or a working long range missile?

hell even if they did have a bomber they wouldn't have the fuel to get it anywhere.

Not to mention they will only have a small number and very limited production.

Compared to the tens of thousands of nukes, fleets of bombers and swarms of fully functional missiles controlled by our side, it's not really a worry.

Indy500 · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:15

Tefal said:
What about it?

how exactly are they going to attack anyone with a large bomb without strategic bomber or a working long range missile?

hell even if they did have a bomber they wouldn't have the fuel to get it anywhere.

Not to mention they will only have a small number and very limited production.

Compared to the tens of thousands of nukes, fleets of bombers and swarms of fully functional missiles controlled by our side, it's not really a worry.

People seem to go ape**** over Iran, and their missiles are pretty short range compared to NK. No nuclear tests either...

MattTheTall77 · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:35

I want a zombie apocolypse, would be much more fun than nukes.

Dugganator · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:40

sr4470 said:
People seem to go ape**** over Iran, and their missiles are pretty short range compared to NK. No nuclear tests either...

The Americans have to have the next war lined up and ready to go..... otherwise they will have nothing to look forward to.

meghatronic · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:43

sr4470 said:
People seem to go ape**** over Iran, and their missiles are pretty short range compared to NK. No nuclear tests either...

Iran has much more potential than NK, primarily due to money.

Glaucus · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:54

I can't see ww3 sarting, I can' see how it can start.

MAD is a brilliant thing, despite what people say. If people start disarming nukes that is when you have to worry about ww3.

At the moment the only possible way I could see it happening is Sum Of All Fears but would have to be more than one nuke.

da_mic_1530 · 15 Sep 2009 at 14:55

just google

end of the world

watch the flash animation, its the 1st result, can't link due to swearies and its not actually very funny, got a few slight smiles the 1st time I saw it though

Messiah Khan · 15 Sep 2009 at 15:06

If there is a WW3, my vote would be for it being China vs USA, possibly triggered over the independence of Taiwan.

Dugganator · 15 Sep 2009 at 15:42

Messiah Khan said:
If there is a WW3, my vote would be for it being China vs USA, possibly triggered over the independence of Taiwan.

I personally would doubt that America would get that involved as Taiwan is a massive cash cow for China. Dont get me wrong America would politically voice against China allowing independence but very much doubt they would go to war over it. My thinking would be one Taiwans location being a lot closer to Russia and China and the fact that China would be very ready to fight for Taiwan so it wouldnt be an easy war.

mmj_uk · 15 Sep 2009 at 15:47

Israel probably when the US loses its superpower status and can no longer back/fund/supply them.

Setting up Israel was like placing a mouse in a cat sanctuary talk about provocation, worst idea of the 20th century in terms of world peace.

Dugganator · 15 Sep 2009 at 15:58

mmj_uk said:
Israel probably when the US loses its superpower status and can no longer back/fund/supply them.

Setting up Israel was like placing a mouse in a cat sanctuary, worst idea of the 20th century in terms of world peace.

Agreed personally I dont understand why they thought that would be a good idea but time will tell I guess.

Marky · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:19

I think Einstein's famous quote says it all really... it would be disastrous...

nesrray · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:28

Don't be so curious, we will see what will happen :]

Tefal · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:31

mmj_uk said:
Israel probably when the US loses its superpower status and can no longer back/fund/supply them.

Setting up Israel was like placing a mouse in a cat sanctuary talk about provocation, worst idea of the 20th century in terms of world peace.

They've got thier own nukes to keep everyone from starting all out war with them though

Dugganator · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:32

Remake of Red Dawn http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1234719/

synopsis: Russia and China invade America.

I wonder if this will be better then the last film. Then again how realistic can it be that Russia and China successfully invade the USA.

Then again Ill watch it when it goes straight to DVD

SfnX · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:40

id imagine theyl scud the white house then america gets ****ed and destroys ahlf the world for no reason. then south korea says "Calm down guy!"
then the british take this opportunity and say the british now control america coz were closest allies!

peterattheboro · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:46

Whatever war it is, it'll be nuclear and we'll all die

Nikumba · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:50

rsatd said:
Its going to be called IWar

Was an good game, IWar 2 was even more awesome

Kimbie

Azagoth · 15 Sep 2009 at 16:56

SfnX said:
id imagine theyl scud the white house then america gets ****ed and destroys ahlf the world for no reason. then south korea says "Calm down guy!"
then the british take this opportunity and say the british now control america coz were closest allies!

So how would you propose getting a Scud to within 186 miles of the White House and launching it? Not to mention the fact that, even with the combined nuclear arsenals of both the USA and Russia, destroying half the World is an impossibility.