Anyway there is a very good chance he will get the gold back legally if its legal owners can't be traced.
2 million would change my life, but legally what would be the ramifications of keeping it and being caught?
How would you even go about attempting to sell that without it being suspicious.
keep it, he'll get no thanks for handing it in
Stealing £2M and getting caught usually results in a long jail sentence. It would undoubtably be theft, so if you kept it the only question would be whether or not you got caught.
My guess would be you'd have to get involved with criminals who could deal with large sums of gold. That would probably be dangerous in itself and you might end up funding things you'd rather not be funding. Terrorism, weapons smuggling, drug smuggling, slavery. All of which involves people who wouldn't be bothered about killing you to take all of it. As well as that risk, you'd be risking attracting the attention of any police or other agency that might be investigating those people. So theft of £2M and funding serious crime, so even more jail time. Not that you'd get £2M, of course. What would you do if the person you were selling it to offered you a choice of £100,000 or a bullet in the head? They might - the only reason they'd have for not killing you is how much inconvenience it would be for them. You might get lucky and somehow make contact with a "white collar" criminal instead. No doubt there are people who are extremely rich and/or work in the financial industry who could launder gold bars in some way and who are averse to violence but not theft. A million for you, a million for them and you both have a million reasons to keep quiet about it.
But that's just part one of the problem. If you somehow manage to sell the gold without being killed or caught, what do you do with the money? The hypothetical rich person you sold it to is fine in that respect - they can hide it amongst the rest of their money. But what do you do with your share? If it changes your life, it attracts attention. If you're living well beyond your apparent income (which you'd have to be for it to change your life), that could attract attention. What answer would you have if the Inland Revenue asked you about how where the money you're spending came from and why you haven't paid tax on it?
What I'd do with it is hand it in to the police and sell the story to a newspaper. That way I get a non-trivial amount of money with no risk, the possibility of more money without risk as a payment from the legitimate owner and even the possibility of keeping the gold without risk if the owner can't be traced after reasonable attempts to find them have failed. If I had a business related to the story, like this person does, I'd be even happier with that course of action because I'd be getting a huge amount of free positive advertising for my business from the media coverage.
Surely that would be better in the bathroom!?
I'd research how I could keep it.
I'd have kept it. Melted it down into golf ball sized spheres and sold them over a period of time.
Stealing £2M and getting caught usually results in a long jail sentence. It would undoubtably be theft, so if you kept it the only question would be whether or not you got caught.
My guess would be you'd have to get involved with criminals who could deal with large sums of gold. That would probably be dangerous in itself and you might end up funding things you'd rather not be funding. Terrorism, weapons smuggling, drug smuggling, slavery. All of which involves people who wouldn't be bothered about killing you to take all of it. As well as that risk, you'd be risking attracting the attention of any police or other agency that might be investigating those people. So theft of £2M and funding serious crime, so even more jail time. Not that you'd get £2M, of course. What would you do if the person you were selling it to offered you a choice of £100,000 or a bullet in the head? They might - the only reason they'd have for not killing you is how much inconvenience it would be for them. You might get lucky and somehow make contact with a "white collar" criminal instead. No doubt there are people who are extremely rich and/or work in the financial industry who could launder gold bars in some way and who are averse to violence but not theft. A million for you, a million for them and you both have a million reasons to keep quiet about it.
But that's just part one of the problem. If you somehow manage to sell the gold without being killed or caught, what do you do with the money? The hypothetical rich person you sold it to is fine in that respect - they can hide it amongst the rest of their money. But what do you do with your share? If it changes your life, it attracts attention. If you're living well beyond your apparent income (which you'd have to be for it to change your life), that could attract attention. What answer would you have if the Inland Revenue asked you about how where the money you're spending came from and why you haven't paid tax on it?
What I'd do with it is hand it in to the police and sell the story to a newspaper. That way I get a non-trivial amount of money with no risk, the possibility of more money without risk as a payment from the legitimate owner and even the possibility of keeping the gold without risk if the owner can't be traced after reasonable attempts to find them have failed. If I had a business related to the story, like this person does, I'd be even happier with that course of action because I'd be getting a huge amount of free positive advertising for my business from the media coverage.
they were already in bars, no need to melt them down. just needed to find someone who makes stuff from gold and sell to them. for example a gold jewellers.
also you can't sell unmarked gold. so melting down would be a big no no. you would need a dodgy dealer to buy unmarked gold, so you may as well sell it marked with kuwaiti stamps to prove it's legit.