kbc said:The 4400+ won't disappoint (maybe because I have one). But you can save ~£15 and get an Opteron 170 to hit those higher clock speeds.
x2 4400 will not reach 2.8ghz on 1.4 v
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
kbc said:The 4400+ won't disappoint (maybe because I have one). But you can save ~£15 and get an Opteron 170 to hit those higher clock speeds.
True. I mean look at mine, but the Opti's still seem to edge it in the clocking stakes. Stock though, the 4400+ is 200mhz faster.kbc said:The 4400+ won't disappoint (maybe because I have one). But you can save ~£15 and get an Opteron 170 to hit those higher clock speeds.
smids said:True. I mean look at mine, but the Opti's still seem to edge it in the clocking stakes. Stock though, the 4400+ is 200mhz faster.
@ easyrider, true, but on 1.49v .
wellBooner! said:its just my cousin is building to the same price scheme as me, both amd systems, he is going ATI X1900xtx and im going 7800GTX , hes going Athon 64 4000+ and im going opteron 170 up dual core, both getting same OCZ 3200 low latency gold 2gb
best performer?
Booner! said:because its cheaper and i can afford it and if i want to cheat i might go SLI and show him its power lol! however i have heard about the X1900XTX being like in a league of its own ? so i guess the 7900GTX would be its competition...that aint out yet though!
my build will be like yours give or take some stuff
im going:
7800GTX
Booner! said:because its cheaper and i can afford it and if i want to cheat i might go SLI and show him its power lol! however i have heard about the X1900XTX being like in a league of its own ? so i guess the 7900GTX would be its competition...that aint out yet though!
my build will be like yours give or take some stuff
kbc said:Be happy, your GTX is still better than easyrider's 7800GT. Mine too.
So the single card X1900XT-X kills 256MB 7800GTX in SLi mode?
easyrider said:my opty does 2.7ghz on stock volts and 2.8ghz on 1.36v
so if you have the extra 100 quid there is no contest imo.
oweneades said:TBH the extra £100 doesn't justify the performance increased gained.
Obviously if you want to spend the extra £100 then do but if you are a bit on the fence post then go for the cheaper X2.
Booner! said:What if i went for the opteron 165 up (1.8ghz 2mb L2 cache) and got the 7800GTX silent OCuk card? because i cant get that other card off my cousin now...
would the opteron work on the dfi lan party nforce 4 board? i know its socket 939 but cant see in the spec if it is compatible
what im trying to get at is
performance difference between
opty 165 up (1.8) and the opty 170 up (2.0ghz)
and the 7800gt (bfg) or the 7800gtx (ocuk)
what best , the better graphics card and slightly lower opty or the higher opty and the lower 7800GT?
sorry about the millions of questions
Havana_UK said:Go for the faster graphics and Opteron 165 - with the DFI LanParty NF4 you should be able to get similar speeds out of the 165 or 170.
Aim for 2.7GHz (which is 300 x 9 with the 165).
Hav
easyrider said:The 10 multi is the better option if you have the budget.