31 Jan 2006 at 17:25 #21 cokecan cokecan Soldato Joined 4 Jan 2004 Posts 7,727 Location Nottingham dirtydog said: PAL DVDs are 720x576, which you'll notice is higher than 640x480. Click to expand... i didt know what res dvd's were in , its not far off but still, gone from up scaling to downscaling. still not good
dirtydog said: PAL DVDs are 720x576, which you'll notice is higher than 640x480. Click to expand... i didt know what res dvd's were in , its not far off but still, gone from up scaling to downscaling. still not good
10 Feb 2006 at 14:03 #22 lemm lemm Associate OP Joined 5 Nov 2002 Posts 320 Location Belgium Sent MS an email regarding the matter, curious to see what they have to say about it and whether an update fix is in the works.
Sent MS an email regarding the matter, curious to see what they have to say about it and whether an update fix is in the works.
10 Feb 2006 at 14:12 #23 PiKe PiKe Caporegime Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 25,287 Location Lake District Pretty sure they could add a scaler in an update, I mean 3 cpu cores, more than enough power for a ffdshow type filter and then some.
Pretty sure they could add a scaler in an update, I mean 3 cpu cores, more than enough power for a ffdshow type filter and then some.
10 Feb 2006 at 14:16 #24 FeFiDoh FeFiDoh Soldato Joined 17 Aug 2005 Posts 7,615 Location Swindon u sure its even playing it in that res? what are u going by?
10 Feb 2006 at 14:22 #25 PiKe PiKe Caporegime Joined 18 Oct 2002 Posts 25,287 Location Lake District Probably the monitor's osd. They don't lie
10 Feb 2006 at 14:35 #26 lemm lemm Associate OP Joined 5 Nov 2002 Posts 320 Location Belgium R5Rich said: u sure its even playing it in that res? what are u going by? Click to expand... Yes I'm 100% sure , I'm going by the monitor osd and the disgusting pixelated 640x480 image quality.
R5Rich said: u sure its even playing it in that res? what are u going by? Click to expand... Yes I'm 100% sure , I'm going by the monitor osd and the disgusting pixelated 640x480 image quality.
, its not far off but still, gone from up scaling to downscaling. still not good
