Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Booooo get your coat!!pinkaardvark said:I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't heard it from the dogs mouth ...![]()
IceShock said:who actually has one of these boxes tho?
Actually, it's been confirmed by a completely different site since.Shocky-FM said:haha, thats pretty cool.
It's more surprising somebody was actually sad enough to care, zoom in and analyze the artwork on the package, not that the picture confirms anything, could be fake for all I know.
Did you reply to the wrong thread or something?drak3 said:A true statement is not considered libellous. In other words you cannot sue for libel and claim damages. Now, I d like to be in that court and watch how the judge will establish the truth of the statement
Judge: "There are no DX 10 games yet, case posponed!"
Ulfhedjinn said:Did you reply to the wrong thread or something?![]()
But why would either of them bring up DirectX 10? They're both Nvidia partners.drak3 said:Just making fun of the possibility this might be dealt with legally![]()
AFTER OUR COLLEAGUES from Hardware.Info broke the story that XFX GeForce 8600GT retail box comes with wolf slime containing EVGA's logo, European HQ of EVGA reacted strongly and won a preliminary injunction against XFX/Pine Technologies.
We have received the documents from Munich Court and Chamber of Commerce that confirm that EVGA won the injunction, damages ranging from 5 to 250.000 Euro and a ban of sales of allegedly offending products in German retail and e-tail stores, until new artwork is produced.
This picture is now being used as a court document:
It's XFX, I expect nothing less than silly and unpressional behaviour from them these days.Cyber-Mav said:why the hell did they do this knowing that they would have to deal with being sued/injunctioned etc? bit silly if you ask me.
jaykay said:illegally advertising thier name