Year 0

I would have thought that there was a person called Jesus who did good things, but whose good deeds have been slightly exaggerated.

Or a Jewish freedom fighter/rabble rouser who took on Rome and the Jewish establishment and lost but had a few friends who were damn good with spin and a fairly good self serving champion who never even met Jesus (cough, ahem Paul ahem cough);)
 
Didn't they define the time as who were Consuls at the time i.e 100BC = The year of Lucius Valerius Flaccus and Gaius Marius.

Sure that's what I read somewhere :confused:

kind of, the julian calender years were identified by naming of the consuls (this is during the empire as well (consuls continued to exist), dionysus (not to be confused with the God) devised 'AD' in his easter table to identify the easters in it
 
Last edited:
kind off, the julian calender years were identified by naming of the consuls (this is during the empire as well (consuls continued to exist), dionysus (not to be confused with the God) devised 'AD' in his easter table to identify the easters in it

Thanks :)

Just been reading about Ab urbe condita as well but understand it was far less commonly used than modern historians like to make out. Also found out that using the Regnal Year was more common in the Byzantine Empire.
 
This is before the BC-AD changeover

when everyone was going,
"Is it AD yet?"

You didn't wind your watch back,
you had to get a new watch.

"Oh, it's AD, is it? ******* hell."

And the Muslim people going,
"AD? Who's he?"
 
There is no year 0. It goes 1BC, 1AD there is no year 0 in the middle.

yes, by the Julian and Gregorian calenders, but there are others, including the astronomical calender that does use a 0, therefore you are not quite right ;)


edit: if you'd actually read the thread, done some studying or not just assumed you were right then we wouldn't be having this discussion :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom