Your views on Raheem Sterling's gun tattoo?
- Thread starter Participant
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 3,253
- Location
- Westergate
Somebody think of the children...........
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Dec 2002
- Posts
- 20,784
- Location
- North Yorkshire
As someone said on Twitter it’s only tribute to Peter Crouch’s robot not a gun.
Look it up on Twitter - I’d post myself but I’m on a phone.
Look it up on Twitter - I’d post myself but I’m on a phone.
Summed up perfectly.
The story should be about how awful the quality of the tattoo is!
I guarantee you if it weren't someone called Raheem who wasn't black this wouldn't be a story... /end
I swear if folks could stop finding reasons to be outraged we may actually see a drop in heart attacks.
Offence is "taken" for a reason.. you've got to choose to be offended.. you can "give" offence but you've got to try a damn sight harder than this.
I swear if folks could stop finding reasons to be outraged we may actually see a drop in heart attacks.
Offence is "taken" for a reason.. you've got to choose to be offended.. you can "give" offence but you've got to try a damn sight harder than this.
its clearly a replica that fires blanks
Have you seen the Scum newspaper today?
"damilola dad says raheem must apologise" the same sort of lazy thought that gets you to "yeah.. well what if it happened to you?" about anything.. that's why we don't do retribution as part of the justice system, oddly enough those affected are rarely the best ones to make a balanced comment about what should be done to avoid future problems.
"damilola dad says raheem must apologise" the same sort of lazy thought that gets you to "yeah.. well what if it happened to you?" about anything.. that's why we don't do retribution as part of the justice system, oddly enough those affected are rarely the best ones to make a balanced comment about what should be done to avoid future problems.
Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Dec 2002
- Posts
- 20,784
- Location
- North Yorkshire
I saw that in passing and I thought what the hell! I would have stopped but then in my mind The Sun would have achieved its purpose with the headline
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 22,383
- Location
- ST4
Couldn't give a single flying **** about his tattoo. It's his leg and his choice. Just goes to further prove that the perpetually offended brigade are a bunch of saddos with nothing better to do with their lives.
What really ****** me off though is the fact that, once again, our scummy press are scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find the slightest thing to smear the England team before they go to a World Cup. Why they can't just get behind the team is beyond me.
What really ****** me off though is the fact that, once again, our scummy press are scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find the slightest thing to smear the England team before they go to a World Cup. Why they can't just get behind the team is beyond me.
This 100%
When will these idiots learn that because of the amount of money they earn and publicity they get they don't get to live a 'normal' life and just do whatever they want.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 3,443
They don't live a normal life but there is nothing to suggest that they lose all freedom just because the media have decided to take offence and put a spin on it to suit their own agenda.
If he wants a tattoo he CAN get one. It ISN'T promoting gun crime in any meaningful way, he is just a footballer. Get this in perspective, its a drawing on his leg!
Associate
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2015
- Posts
- 1,489
- Location
- Tewkesbury, UK
+1, it looks terrible
His leg probably gets more airtime than his face does (esp given how much he misses)
If he wanted a gun on his leg - and he had 1/2 brain of course - he should have had the equivalent of the red/white no entry road sign over the top to make it perfectly clear
Generally speaking people don't get tattoos of something they hate - so at best its very misleading