*** Youtube/Video thread ***
- Thread starter Zefan
- Start date
Her Wiki page mentions Andy Warhol, that's all you need to know really.
The whole purpose is to make you think and freak you out, and it's pretty damn good at it.
You conveniently ignore no other high rise structure, besides WTC1 & 2, has ever totally collapsed as a result of fire.
Theories about girders melting/losing structual integrity could be easily simulated, the building blueprints all exist, so why has no independent body done that research? Surely its of vital importance as there are likely thousands of other buildings in the world at risk of catastrophic failure by fire ... if you believe such a thing is possible.
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Apr 2016
- Posts
- 28
Plenty of independent bodies have done that research, you just haven't spared the 9 seconds it takes to dispel your stupid theories.
And yes, there are such buildings, hence the massive legal obligation of building designers and occupiers to establish hugely detailed and regulated fire management plans, as well as the existence of the fire department.
Which, unsurprisingly, is why it is considered in design and construction. Unlike invisible people planting invisible explosives in an inhabited building for insane reasons. Or using disruptor beams for the same insane reasons.
If you can refer to a very tall tower structure that was constructed in a similar way to WTC1 and 2 and suffered massive impact damage that wrecked multiple floors and then burned uncontrollably for hours and which didn't collapse, do so.
Even assuming there was a Secret Conspiracy Group with unknown technology that could have brought down the towers without being seen, why would they bother doing that and carry out the attacks that were seen? Even if they were all total sociopaths, why bother taking the risk of doing it at all? Lies would have been a safer way to start wars. Weapons of mass destruction and all that stuff.
The sound made by a piano is made louder by the soundboard in it. So yes, it is amplified. Mechanically rather than electronically, but it is amplified.
I've no idea what the noise regulations are in that place, but it would be silly if whether an instrument played at the same volume was allowed or not depended solely on the details of how that amount of sound was generated.
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 8,144
- Location
- one nation under sony
Soldato
- Joined
- 12 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 3,330
- Location
- Orpington.
It's a ******** video rather than Youtube but it's probably one of the most powerful videos I've seen in a long time.
It's a quick 4 mins of short clips about "Black Lives Matter" asking why black on black crime doesn't matter to the BLM movement. Regardless of your thoughts as to who is right and wrong it's a video which inspires conversation.
***contains swearing and graphic images*** - if it contains swearing & graphic images then you know it isn't suitable for here
It's a quick 4 mins of short clips about "Black Lives Matter" asking why black on black crime doesn't matter to the BLM movement. Regardless of your thoughts as to who is right and wrong it's a video which inspires conversation.
***contains swearing and graphic images*** - if it contains swearing & graphic images then you know it isn't suitable for here
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting info about fonts.
I got the bat price right, for the other 2 questions it's 5 minutes, then 47 days. how clever am I? Counting the pennies of my benefits money for many years helps to be astute lol.
Because BLM is about the low tariff US society at large places on black lives, illustrated on a weekly basis by state (police) killings which simply shouldn't happen.
Black on Black killings are not directly symptomatic of a societal bias against people of colour. Whilst being black might mean they are statistically more likely to be caught up in gang killings, those killings don't happen just because they are black. Unlike the extra judicial killings at the hands of The Law, which are often rooted in the institutional mistrust of the black man.
Black lives matter isn't so called because they seek to save all black lives. It's mo-op is to level the playing field where white faces otherwise get better treatment (like being given a similar benefit of the doubt before being 'suicided by cop')