The GTX Titan X owners thread.

VEGACORTEZ · 16 Jun 2015 at 16:56

@africanos23

What fans speeds are you running on your sli setup out of interest and what temps are you getting?

bigmac121 · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:36

VEGACORTEZ said:
Yep you are right on that. A youtube channel OC the X and ti to the same OC and the titan won every time as expected. In fact the titan even beat the ti hybrid which had a higher overclock. Titan all the way for 4k but under that res the ti is the better more cost effective option obviously.

Linky please

VEGACORTEZ · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:51

bigmac121 said:
Linky please

Hi,
If you search jayztwocents on youtube you should find his channel. He has benched ti, ti hybrid and gigabyte g1 ti compared to the TX. Sorry can't link, on mobile device and keeps going to the app instead of website, stupid thing.

bigmac121 · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

VEGACORTEZ said:
Hi,
If you search jayztwocents on youtube you should find his channel. He has benched ti, ti hybrid and gigabyte g1 ti compared to the TX. Sorry can't link, on mobile device and keeps going to the app instead of website, stupid thing.

NP I have subcribed to his channel 2 months ago

Dicehunter · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

Looks like my TX may be on the MM soon if the Fury X surpasses it

PFarrey · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:41

Would someone mind cutting the ******** out and tell me whether the titan x beats the fury x? I don't care for value for money, I would happily pay an extra £500 for a 1% improvement in performance. All I am after is the absolute best. Tx or fury x?

Will be run on custom water.

wunkley · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:44

PFarrey said:
I would happily pay an extra £500 for a 1% improvement in performance.

Why?

But, why?

No, seriously, why?

How very odd. Etc.

To answer your question. No benchmarks yet, so no one actually knows. The big '390x' thread is literally jizzing over with ridiculousness and no real facts at the moment.

setter · 16 Jun 2015 at 20:45

PFarrey said:
Would someone mind cutting the ******** out and tell me whether the titan x beats the fury x? I don't care for value for money, I would happily pay an extra £500 for a 1% improvement in performance. All I am after is the absolute best. Tx or fury x?

Will be run on custom water.

No one knows for sure as there are no benchmarks for the fury x yet.

Simon Belmont · 16 Jun 2015 at 21:17

Dicehunter said:
Looks like my TX may be on the MM soon if the Fury X surpasses it

Why? Titan X is still the fastest GPU. Theirs no benchmarks to say otherwise. Even if it was slightly faster there's no was in hell I would sell my Titan X for and big ass AMD AIO cooler GPU. lol no way....

africanos23 · 16 Jun 2015 at 21:47

VEGACORTEZ said:
@africanos23

What fans speeds are you running on your sli setup out of interest and what temps are you getting?

If I remember correctly 68% fan speed in Witcher 3 which is one of the more intense games on the GPUs (in terms of heat) its around 79/73 or so @ 27c ambient with a heavyish OC.

Note : I changed my fans to new ones and they're rubbish compared to my older ones + I have added a dust-kit which causes the temps to go up another 2-3c.

With the old fans and no dust-kit drops around 3-4c.

ChrisD. · 16 Jun 2015 at 21:48

I honestly don't think I could go back to AMD at the minute, too bad an experience with the 290X's.

africanos23 · 16 Jun 2015 at 21:51

S2KIP said:
I honestly don't think I could go back to AMD at the minute, too bad an experience with the 290X's.

Fury is slower than TX. FuryX2 is faster ... no point AT ALL.

ChrisD. · 16 Jun 2015 at 21:54

africanos23 said:
Fury is slower than TX. FuryX2 is faster ... no point AT ALL.

I guess for the sake of resale value, it's good that it is. But either way, I am not really bothered if it's faster, as overall my experience of gaming with Nvidia cards has been better than AMD over the past few years.

Simon Belmont · 16 Jun 2015 at 21:55

africanos23 said:
Fury is slower than TX. FuryX2 is faster ... no point AT ALL.

Fury X2 is 2 gpu's of course it would be faster. it would have the CF problems AMD are known for.

africanos23 · 16 Jun 2015 at 22:04

Simon Belmont said:
Fury X2 is 2 gpu's of course it would be faster. it would have the CF problems AMD are known for.

Doubt it can beat 2xTXs though

Simon Belmont · 16 Jun 2015 at 22:31

africanos23 said:
Doubt it can beat 2xTXs though

+1

Divine Pain · 16 Jun 2015 at 23:10

ive noticed some titan x has dropped a few 20-30 pounds from the msi, gigabyte and i think the standard ecga one has dropped a little, unless im seeing things

Boomstick777 · 16 Jun 2015 at 23:26

Divine Pain said:
ive noticed some titan x has dropped a few 20-30 pounds from the msi, gigabyte and i think the standard ecga one has dropped a little, unless im seeing things

Yeah they always drop a few months after launch, I doubt this is anything to do with new AMD cards but just the initial hike dying down.

OCUK have sold them for £799 before today..

Born_2_Kill_83 · 17 Jun 2015 at 09:12

S2KIP said:
I honestly don't think I could go back to AMD at the minute, too bad an experience with the 290X's.

This, put me off for quite a few year I'm afraid. I don't care how fast it is when you have crossfire you actually don't, all crossfire is good for is looking at.

Dicehunter · 17 Jun 2015 at 14:06

Born_2_Kill_83 said:
This, put me off for quite a few year I'm afraid. I don't care how fast it is when you have crossfire you actually don't, all crossfire is good for is looking at.

Well going off the "Leaked" benchmarks, the TX and FX are neck and neck.