****OFFICIAL****3D Mark 11 Benchmarks Results Thread

[Greebo]

Yep, ill maybe give the modded drivers a whirl, btw, good score Greebo, i think im currently on the limit with the cards cores/shaders, raising the memory speed from stock (1674 - 1700) gave me a little boost, cpu running at 4050, (21 x 193).

Yeah but you loose almost 2000 points by the combined not working properly. In the graphics tests, you#re not far behind me and in one you beat me.

 

[Locky]

have you got a link to this tweak?

Edit no matter I sorted it.

 

[vorticalspace]

Spec as per sig
It would appear the trusty Q6600 is struggling somewhat

 

[Locky]

core i7 950 @ 4.2 and GTX 480 SLI @ 875/2050


3DMark Score P11431

Graphics score 12251

Physics Score 10100

Combined Score 8767

GraphicsTest1 52.75 FPS

GraphicsTest2 56.19 FPS

GraphicsTest3 77.35 FPS

GraphicsTest4 39.35 FPS

PhysicsTest 32.06 FPS

CombinedTest 40.78 FPS

 

[setter]

Very nice Locky.

 

[Gamefreak501]

Well, I got it right this time, but only 4001 3D Marks!

I did get 3999 on a previous test (because I had other stuff running) and 4003 on another test (not sure why).

Just got 4001 again.

Piccie:

Full detail URL:

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/99088

 

[straxusii]

Well, I got it right this time, but only 4001 3D Marks!

I did get 3999 on a previous test (because I had other stuff running) and 4003 on another test (not sure why).

I think the benchmark is quite CPU dependant

 

[chaotic_uk]

I think the benchmark is quite CPU dependant

indeed and it favours intel over amd , must be something to do with they are faster lol

 

[Gamefreak501]

indeed and it favours intel over amd , must be something to do with they are faster lol

lol

I should have got an i7, never mind!

 

[OLDPHART]

Some nice overclocks going on here, good to see.

+1 Yes on both ATI + NVidea whether the CPU is AMD or Intel, my 470 has hit the brick wall > 890/1780/2130 1087mv. I might be able to squeeze a tad more but its not worth it, it will not do 900/1800/1674 1087mv.

Good job Locky cracked the 10k in good style > 11431, a good job to all.

 

[Cosimo]

core i7 950 @ 4.2 and GTX 480 SLI @ 875/2050


3DMark Score P11431

Great score.

 

[Greebo]

Cracking score Locky. Those gtx480 are really pulling ahead of my gtx470 in 3dmark11.

I wonder why my physics score is so low compared to yours though? Might have to look into that.

 

[Skyrocket]

Cracking score Locky. Those gtx480 are really pulling ahead of my gtx470 in 3dmark11.

I wonder why my physics score is so low compared to yours though? Might have to look into that.

Because he has about
30Gb/s more memory bandwidth.
16 more ROP's
64 more Shader Cores.

 

[Locky]

Even at 4.2ghz, I run the ram uber tight, 2000mhz @ 16,7,7,7 1T

My physics score is 10100, yours is 9160, there isn't much in it and various tweaks would pull it closer,

Unless the GPU makes any different to the physics score I don't know.

I would love to try this system on a highly overclocked 980x

 

[RavenXXX2]

895 core 2050 mem

P6531 3DMarks


Graphics score
6225

Physics Score
9359

Combined Score
6028

GraphicsTest1
26.91 FPS

GraphicsTest2
28.43 FPS

GraphicsTest3
39.23 FPS

GraphicsTest4
20.02 FPS

PhysicsTest
29.71 FPS

CombinedTest
28.04 FPS

 

[easyrider]

wheres the table of results in the opening post?

 

[Greebo]

Even at 4.2ghz, I run the ram uber tight, 2000mhz @ 16,7,7,7 1T

My physics score is 10100, yours is 9160, there isn't much in it and various tweaks would pull it closer,

Unless the GPU makes any different to the physics score I don't know.

I would love to try this system on a highly overclocked 980x

Pretty sure physics is cpu only. But I have noticed the cpu makes quite a difference to all the other gpu scores so I will be losing marks there as well.

Said to say I only have my memory running at 1600mhz @ 20,8,8,8,1T

 

[Greebo]

Because he has about
30Gb/s more memory bandwidth.
16 more ROP's
64 more Shader Cores.

Maybe so but does that really equate to 26% better performance in 3dmark11? It really shouldn't be that big of a gap.

 

[RavenXXX2]

^^ Yeah it should. And what clocks are your 470's at?

 

[Greebo]

^^ Yeah it should. And what clocks are your 470's at?

875 from memory, I will have to check. You saying it should be 26%? I thought clock for clock the gtx470 was only 10% behind a gtx480 or does 3dmark11 make the gap much bigger?