****OFFICIAL****3D Mark 11 Benchmarks Results Thread

[wunkley]

Quick question - Does 3dmark 11 use physx at all as part of the benchmark/ result?

I have an ATI 6870 and an nvidia gt 240 for hybrid physx (which works like a charm).
Vantage used to give a message about the result being invalid cos of the physx, and I'm now confused about the 11 situation. I also can't actually see if 3dmark 11 uses the gt240 as my second monitor goes black during the benchmark and I can't see my little widgets monitoring both of the graphics card usage etc...

P.S. I'm getting around 4,400 (free version default settings) with specs in my sig and the 6870 clocked to 940 core, 1150 mem

 

[the1gooner]

No it doesn't use it.

What's your scores for the parts of the benchmark?

 

[BananaDunka]

Bah, fails to load some of the gfx tests so I have to end task.

FAIL.

 

[wunkley]

No it doesn't use it.

What's your scores for the parts of the benchmark?

Just run again and only got 4290. Also, tinkered with the screen settings a bit in the nvidia control panel monitor settings to see if could get second monitor displaying during the benchmark (I have my main monitor hooked up to the 6870 and the second to the gt240) and weirdly it would show for some tests and not others. Interestingly for the first physics test my second monitor displayed and I could see the gt240 was at 13% gpu usage, but the clocks were at idle. Seems odd no?

Anyway, detailed results below:

3DMark ScoreP4290
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Graphics score4168
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Physics Score5108
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combined Score4206
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GraphicsTest120.0 FPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GraphicsTest220.35 FPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GraphicsTest325.72 FPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GraphicsTest412.09 FPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PhysicsTest16.22 FPS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CombinedTest19.56 FPS

 

[q6600]

core i7 950 @ 4.2 and GTX 480 SLI @ 875/2050


3DMark Score P11431

Graphics score 12251

Physics Score 10100

Combined Score 8767

GraphicsTest1 52.75 FPS

GraphicsTest2 56.19 FPS

GraphicsTest3 77.35 FPS

GraphicsTest4 39.35 FPS

PhysicsTest 32.06 FPS

CombinedTest 40.78 FPS

Nice on mate. I wonder how accurate this benchmark is, i pull 10055 with sli of gtx 580 (960mhz ) and an i7 950 oc " 4.4 and you pull 11k with sli gtx 480 @875mhz

 

[Greebo]

Nice on mate. I wonder how accurate this benchmark is, i pull 10055 with sli of gtx 580 (960mhz ) and an i7 950 oc " 4.4 and you pull 11k with sli gtx 480 @875mhz

Have you done the tweak to allow SLI to run properly? From memory I noticed you hadn;t and your combined scores suck.

I reckon you will have another 2000 to 3000 points if you do the mod.

 

[q6600]

I use the mod dirvers 265.09
"combined scores suck. " what is the influential factor for this score?

 

[Greebo]

I use the mod dirvers 265.09
"combined scores suck. " what is the influential factor for this score?

You need to edit your config/profile file as awell as using the quatro drivers.

If you disable your sli and run the combined test you will see that a single cards runs smoother and scores higher than both your cards together.

You're getting 3356 points in combined and 15.61 fps. I can get more with a single gtx470. Locky gets 8767 and 40.78fps and your gtx580's will beat that easily once you have your SLI working properly.

Your gpu score is 1500 more than Locky and your physics matches, your combined should be over 10,000 I reckon.

 

[Locky]

massive.

I got 8.5k without the tweak,

load up nvidia inspector... click on the small square tab, then in global settings, click on sli compatibility bits dx 10. change the zero values to

0x080000F5

click apply, close inspector.

http://downloads.guru3d.com/NVIDIA-Inspector-1.94-download-2612.html

 

[q6600]

You need to edit your config/profile file as awell as using the quatro drivers.

If you disable your sli and run the combined test you will see that a single cards runs smoother and scores higher than both your cards together.

You're getting 3356 points in combined and 15.61 fps. I can get more with a single gtx470. Locky gets 8767 and 40.78fps and your gtx580's will beat that easily once you have your SLI working properly.

Your gpu score is 1500 more than Locky and your physics matches, your combined should be over 10,000 I reckon.

Ok
can you show me the way please.

 

[setter]

Some great scores guys, ill have to sort out my drivers to get it running properly, my 2 cards have been tested at 800/1600/1700, 1.087, hopefully tweak the memory a bit higher than 1700, virgin territory for me tbh the last card i clocked was an xfx 280 gtx, 714/1251/1504, ill admit im more wary with gpu overclocking than cpu's, which ive only clocked 4 off.

 

[Locky]

once q6600 sort's out the driver tweak he will get 12.5k I reckon.

 

[evulboo]

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/115890

3DMark ScoreP4813

Graphics score5184

Physics Score4289

Combined Score3560


not to bad for my spec

 

[vorticalspace]

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/115890

3DMark ScoreP4813

Graphics score5184

Physics Score4289

Combined Score3560


not to bad for my spec

Good & very similar to mine with a GTX580
Your CPU slightly higher clocked must have made a difference

3DMark Score P4982
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Graphics score 5655
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Physics Score 4004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combined Score 3267

 

[khemist]

i5 [email protected] GTX580

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/117192

3DMark Score P6739

Graphics score 6627

Physics Score 7632

Combined Score 6434

GraphicsTest 128.72 FPS

GraphicsTest 230.19 FPS

GraphicsTest 341.83 FPS

GraphicsTest 421.29 FPS

PhysicsTest 24.23 FPS

CombinedTest 29.93 FPS

 

[Mr Krugga]

I can has 5850s results to compete with?

 

[RavenXXX2]

Here http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=17951473&postcount=72 1200 core clock might take some beating.

 

[Mr Krugga]

Here http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=17951473&postcount=72 1200 core clock might take some beating.

Cheers. My results on the right, hope I will be able to compete

 

[RavenXXX2]

Close but no cigar, must clock faster. I guess futuremark has screwed up the the clock detection on his 5850.

 

[Mr Krugga]

Close but no cigar, must clock faster. I guess futuremark has screwed up the the clock detection on his 5850.

That is with 1GHz on core at 1.2V, I've got plenty of headroom yet

The result is from yesterday, I'm kind busy trolling atm and writing an essay, will do a run at 1.1GHz soon.